Re: [hybi] WebSocket feedback

Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> Thu, 04 March 2010 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <gregw@webtide.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD493A7977 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:47:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2u09gRcmBdPf for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9E23A6922 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so2507042fxm.29 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.64.141 with SMTP id e13mr2429049fai.101.1267692447777; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (host116-234-static.43-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it [88.43.234.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm193097fxm.4.2010.03.04.00.47.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:47:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B8F7399.40208@webtide.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:47:21 +0100
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
References: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F032E566DDF@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002150605580.29686@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B8F6056.8060809@webtide.com> <CE4EF44A-6C8F-43BC-ABF4-777C1149A16F@d2dx.com> <4B8F72FA.2050908@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B8F72FA.2050908@webtide.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [hybi] WebSocket feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:47:30 -0000

Greg Wilkins wrote:
> Vladimir,
> 
> GET's can have content.  It's just the browsers mostly don't send
> content with GETs.

I'd also not be opposed to using POST.  That would prevent any automatic
retries of the GET request by HTTP infrastructure that does not know
about websocket.

cheers