IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Wed, 01 December 2010 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <w@1wt.eu>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96F83A6B46 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:47:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.449, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxQ2iOn-1MyN for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:47:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1wt.eu (1wt.eu [62.212.114.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF923A6C82 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:47:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB1ImSBg020967; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 19:48:28 +0100
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:48:28 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Message-ID: <20101201184828.GH19021@1wt.eu>
References: <AANLkTik0wR-Oag5YJJDmdiSy67WW6TMaHmqWEo4o5kGW@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimwEtKrJm5KxTYZ4wrtONBYDTGjE5LF7__AHBEU@mail.gmail.com> <20101201183540.GF19021@1wt.eu> <AANLkTi=r-is4ZqJc6itsaBkyrmW746xXj8OV78M_Qbi3@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=r-is4ZqJc6itsaBkyrmW746xXj8OV78M_Qbi3@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:47:22 -0000

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:43:59PM -0500, John Tamplin wrote:
> AFAIK, the Hello frames do not appear in any draft and only in Greg's
> proposal.  Personally, I am not sure what exactly they buy us and I
> don't know if we want to pay the extra round trip for them.

I'm sorry, I thought we had that in -03. At some point I'm getting lost
between proposals and drafts :-)

> So, if we really want this to be incremental, it would be a change
> from Ian's last draft.

That's what I wanted indeed.

> As I understand it, these are the components of Adam's latest proposal:
>  1) use CONNECT instead of GET+Upgrade
>  2) use a fixed, bogus host header and mask the real headers
>  3) mask all payload data
>  4) encode the headers as JSON

I think we agree on the process then !

Cheers,
Willy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email