IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Criteria for evaluating handshake proposals

Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> Thu, 09 December 2010 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3286628C0E7 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:39:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.344
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.344 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.255, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tc6OOX761oi7 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F7B28C0CF for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so1528478ewy.40 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:41:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HAm8uxz9dPHqyJoeZPvH3uRdnScb7KkR0Wd0B1Rg7Hk=; b=ai509S5HsXyjt+IBpB75GaMgFwvQm/c9F1Wbzkpr1j0gIpeEWMwBtYnOB9hUyOTWr/ TWofNlFrau3+qbVFmhFEx/Qv65FBIXFNcnet3q0kSRqSsM++v9LAN4fr1LeziNIHCmtI SNoXxr6mJdx1cZqTFHFcOukOlg5gS/dLJudUM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qO1coQALyxS84Jbf/nzlW+/Qnni6S+6rGmPqzHHgS4PszFDzYeldpFjBNyaBmGgs0H RLuxD7KUlqLondcHjtRUjoEAhsDLgUrUBaBesmeeJ8kIVb07AoplmHTmIInog5BcZ9OX sAj+J7aealZRPtb7zqMbQoaN9CIv4Y8e+6fbQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.34.198 with SMTP id m6mr293877ebd.88.1291887662583; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:41:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.16.142 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:41:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin56uLi2uZDP0DQuNaRpe0a7-UtgYQFscyK8U5R@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4CFFE943.6050601@isode.com> <AANLkTin56uLi2uZDP0DQuNaRpe0a7-UtgYQFscyK8U5R@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:41:02 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTinwhguM34xS2yCdz9sFxkMEdyfJzBTmp9bokN59@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Criteria for evaluating handshake proposals
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:39:35 -0000

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote:
> On 8 December 2010 21:23, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>> What are other things people care about?
>
> Making some progress of some kind in some direction

Is it also possible that people made too much progress and got lost?

I think we should go back to basic, starting from a "pure" WS
protocol. People who want HTTP head for WS connection should remake
their case. Now we have more experience after much contemplation and
discussion, we are in a better position to value its worth.

- Zhong Yu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email