IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sun, 26 October 2014 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB1E1A0059 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcPM1BebBvIq for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E31E1A0097 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3340; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414337783; x=1415547383; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=ufePz/KZg9fB5E3bz/bJ3vEZkw3/y2TsWSnFfcUAklQ=; b=hGKIDjjTPVT5XrZL3oK0FNiOmg27l+b6I1xSlOBF1q8BXCnfMB5PV42A 1Wx4/DP+K5Wx/8oH2l14iccdjBbFc5pM3FxjIQ8/01Ctk74k6TeLEgAEt 0rXZffEbq0J5rmAZ8Wi23nl9LdU3nKomCHaXv7OHzSzRARRUUh762RqKK U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIEALUUTVStJssW/2dsb2JhbABch0DRPAKBHAF9hAMBAQQjZgkCBAETCSECAg8CRgYBDAgBAYg9lnScX5QEAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBARqRD4J3gVQBBJQXgVCHeodsjkKDeTyCegEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,790,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="225951739"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2014 15:36:09 +0000
Received: from [10.61.108.74] (dhcp-10-61-108-74.cisco.com [10.61.108.74]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9QFa8lI013687; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:36:09 GMT
Message-ID: <544D14F2.40906@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:36:18 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <E74C02CC-8A35-4057-95E4-14925B332456@cooperw.in> <544B44BD.7030805@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <544B44BD.7030805@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="I6sT091LjPG0QxHJuJVhfq9NlaNt1JX64"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/KRrm1aZs4HU2yD5XOJPpXzbeKmQ
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:36:24 -0000

Hi again, Alissa,

On 10/25/14, 8:35 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>> =
>>
>> Why is the recently implemented audit not mentioned in response to
>> the question about a description of the oversight mechanism?
>
> Happy to include, and would invite proposed text.
>

Actually, here is what I propose, next to the annual supplement discussion:

        In accordance with these supplements, an  annual
        review is performed to ensure that protocol parameter
        requests are being processed according to the established
        policies.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email