Re: [Ianaplan] Review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01

["Richard Hill" <[e-mail]>]

OK for me.

Thanks and best,
Richard
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Ianaplan [mailto:[e-mail]]On Behalf Of Eliot Lear
  Sent: samedi, 25. octobre 2014 12:48
  To: [e-mail]; Alissa Cooper; [e-mail]
  Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01


  Hi Richard,


  On 10/25/14, 12:27 PM, Richard Hill wrote:

    Many thanks to both Alissa and Eliot for this.

    I largely (not not entirely) agree with Alissa's comments, and I almost entirely  agree with Eliot's proposed dispostions.

    Here is where I differ from what Eliot has proposed.

    Re "We will contintue to coordinate with ICANN regarding those changes", I would propose  "We will continue to coordinate with the IANA functions operator (at present ICANN) regarding those changes", or something along those lines.



  Perhaps we need a different approach, if people feel strongly about that particular phrase in this response, because in this context we are talking about the DNS protocol, and that requires a lot of coordination when we make changes, and perhaps it's not just with ICANN or the IANA functions operator.  So...

  I suggest then:

            The IETF specifies the DNS protocol.  From time to time
            there have been and will be updates to that protocol.    As we
            make changes we will broadly consult the operational
            community about the impact of those changes, as we have
            done in the past.

  Eliot