Re: [Ianaplan] Review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01

[JFC Morfin <[e-mail]>]

At 02:33 29/10/2014, John Curran wrote:
>Note - you do not have to have any first-hand experience in these matters to
>provide thoughtful analysis,

John,
I certainly agree with you on the ultimate result.

This is not my point. My point is on who is initiating the change, 
how it proceeds, for whose convenience, and how it is dicussed.

>however, it is necessary to research the actual
>events

The way you introduced the documents, probably looking each time at 
the next step to show me wrong ...

>  prior to commentary if you wish to be taken seriously.

... actually shows me right to those who do not consider the past 
environment as going to be perpetuated. Something you seem to bet. In 
such a case I would certainly be wrong.

The point is that the technical environment is going to change due to 
the "MYCANN plugs-in".
Not so much the one I advocate: the others.

My ICANN/ICP-3 conformant MPI project is only a way for the Libre and 
the various RFC 6852 communities to be able to understand, 
experiment, possibly enhance, and counter the introduction of various 
State rogue MPIs. Do you really believe that any serious Gov is going 
to bet its national cyberspace and entire economy on non-US 
oversigthen ICANN's fancies?

There is the real world, and the I*core's one. This later world was 
credible as long as it was under NTIA oversight.
As a  Dan Tapscott/Lynn StAmour "Global Solution Network" subject to 
FCC rulings; I am sorry, it is not credible anymore to a Governement 
and to any serious operator. I know this is not something you 
wish/like to be told, but you know this is true.

We will soon see what Putin and Xi Dada think about it.

jfc