Re: [Ianaplan] Review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01

John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> Mon, 27 October 2014 23:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jcurran@istaff.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD521A8796 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sxD-cx01VzDq for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 522871A8722 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [200.73.76.67] (helo=[10.10.0.157]) by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jcurran@istaff.org>) id 1Xiu0D-00020x-A7; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:47:09 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Originating-IP: 200.73.76.67
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/RYBNr2UEh4ttr6BS21NVX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141027180404.407AB1A88F0@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:47:12 -0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <232BE25A-BB7A-46F0-BFF0-00141D96A95F@istaff.org>
References: <E74C02CC-8A35-4057-95E4-14925B332456@cooperw.in> <544B44BD.7030805@cisco.com> <734aafb2601d4c7f9fa3184daa6dddb1@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <544D3DC3.5000409@cisco.com> <544D4437.7080108@meetinghouse.net> <20141027180404.407AB1A88F0@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/dtdz5RypY4c8JQA6Unzjw_L-H5Q
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:47:14 -0000

On Oct 27, 2014, at 4:02 PM, JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com> wrote:
> ...
> Should all this not be discussed at the PSO as per RFC 2691, the IETF has established to that end (ICANN/IETF protocol parameters issues)?

<http://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/docs2003/icann-pso-notice/>

FYI,
/John