Re: [Ianaplan] update on trademarks and domains & IETF trust

Konstantinos Komaitis <komaitis@isoc.org> Fri, 22 January 2016 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <komaitis@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB97D1ACE5B for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:38:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5vpOkN3KTi4I for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:37:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0675.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:675]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F221ACE58 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DM2PR0601MB1328.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.222.142) by DM2PR0601MB1325.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.222.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.390.13; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:37:39 +0000
Received: from DM2PR0601MB1328.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.222.142]) by DM2PR0601MB1328.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.222.142]) with mapi id 15.01.0390.013; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:37:39 +0000
From: Konstantinos Komaitis <komaitis@isoc.org>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Thread-Topic: [Ianaplan] update on trademarks and domains & IETF trust
Thread-Index: AQHRU9rw1Q0rFlXj0kWVxrSWEq1lOZ8HSViA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:37:38 +0000
Message-ID: <A20A247F-D6D2-4317-BCAD-7314AF44BAD9@isoc.org>
References: <1ECCDCCB-234E-4201-9E20-F236D665766D@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <1ECCDCCB-234E-4201-9E20-F236D665766D@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=komaitis@isoc.org;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [173.255.175.145]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR0601MB1325; 5:bxXF/o8C5GW1hCKItz0mbu7Vz8gqL1BYvIk+bMNdlFOGtDPgHxPM7c60CsdKfEKNHUOZT2DbUhGL+C+10QTCDshuzviocsxNeIenoGMtm8r5WSW2dcWo14d9iE5ZPgOx55rrci3TbwGIF+bwXJ7yag==; 24:v7G03YyWQO6jx6F5DL6JdYAYOCNhNssVEdYaFmO2ecFFgmx9BYwFcnmg41ghC0EXJTlPjDFFUcC77bA6aJcunageeWH964lmO36Y+09OyIM=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0601MB1325;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0911dab2-17ad-4a76-9c86-08d3230fab2e
x-ld-processed: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR0601MB13253294C847EB0F6EC86FECB7C40@DM2PR0601MB1325.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(123027)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(520078)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:DM2PR0601MB1325; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0601MB1325;
x-forefront-prvs: 08296C9B35
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(66066001)(87936001)(99286002)(106356001)(6116002)(105586002)(101416001)(5002640100001)(33656002)(5008740100001)(40100003)(83716003)(76176999)(2906002)(5001960100002)(110136002)(77096005)(586003)(5004730100002)(82746002)(86362001)(102836003)(50986999)(97736004)(122556002)(2950100001)(106116001)(36756003)(3846002)(1220700001)(54356999)(16236675004)(189998001)(92566002)(1096002)(10400500002)(4326007)(2900100001)(81156007)(11100500001)(61793002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0601MB1325; H:DM2PR0601MB1328.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A20A247FD6D24317BCAD7314AF44BAD9isocorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jan 2016 09:37:38.3280 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR0601MB1325
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/zTGilxs0QxVY27hugiX2Z4mn9uM>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] update on trademarks and domains & IETF trust
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:38:01 -0000

Hi Jari,

may I suggest one slight edit/amendment to consider in the following:


c.  The IETF Trust will hold, maintain and renew the IANA IP in accordance with good IP management practices and shall seek new territorial registrations based on the IANA IP as instructed by the IANA IP Reps.

The language “good IP management practices” seems to be quite open-ended. Although every trademark owner should exercise, to the best of their abilities, good management of their IPR, there is no set framework of what this could mean — at least one that is generally acceptable or endorsed through law. So, this language could be subjectively interpreted to mean anything and it could, in theory at least, raise some potential issues of liability. I think it is important that the Trust does not do anything more than what the law prescribes in coordination with the operational communities.

If I may suggest the following as an alternative - or something along those lines:

c.  The IETF Trust will hold, maintain and renew the IANA IPR in accordance with established legal requirements and shall seek new territorial registrations based on the IANA IPR as instructed by the IANA IP Reps and according to the applicable laws of each territory .


Thanks

Konstantinos

Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis
Senior Policy Advisor
The Internet Society