[Iasa20] Memo exploring options for IASA 2.0 models

Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> Wed, 14 February 2018 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FBE126FDC for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:29:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lNkSTKE_32K5 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:29:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79963126CD8 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:29:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id x27so9851641qtm.12 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:29:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; h=from:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=AFnqkvOn+RnFBcWSBJ2xKp2x1uUa+uGwFB04Zv500/Y=; b=eM3RI7foaIfIEbFjtyvSC9/v+BHdrLOAUfAdmzc812LTpOYGt2qZVJfGcN3JNLe9bR vff6JDZPGnBtIkhvSDBKL1QSTXl3GOHth4ul1G/ZfAGJafMZxOjpbKsgj+MAXqQwykPm PqUS8fGHGQ0qowJW14IdHPl6NGtHGez9NCJms=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=AFnqkvOn+RnFBcWSBJ2xKp2x1uUa+uGwFB04Zv500/Y=; b=hyA+z6lblu6ktSz15SxQT+1euFmoQ/QcbYGZDQhF6c5mCjrr4t6zUfZnd00vTyP8G9 5jgdlnbyeFq3Bmk9VgcNJAX8Tg3T90JGuirfSWD+X/qKInJSP+3Nau+5XPWcdc/9A7YT LW0mzjCR2vfIH5uHtiZZsnbyWFAAgtg8QZxyggguRdO3BOHkM7a5IEwbJ7HRO9+PeUQg ybOMy1thTNLG7N6qUuk4kSYtF3V0O7JlU/JdF7nGINViPCOr7b9qGzEGQLwr7eklznd5 LPeb/OBgtq3V3RN4yyVenErH/ntsefTjOT1MPyhzp5COua09+12rdO2EJSqY17WA1jqh AqWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPACWV3NgPmQajF2IZcmmIFbc793gWfbvB3FheDuQu5GiLRk7cmP /Wr3raG+4UEMfoc6+hQwmRq0kF34HKc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225RvjOg+XKtP70MOGlJ/qoFdB1z5BL3X628W1WU1I8JgrPcW2e5d/CBC8H8OrqRR1DAy+NU9g==
X-Received: by with SMTP id s44mr1269114qtk.57.1518650956009; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:29:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hypochilid.home (pool-108-31-127-222.washdc.fios.verizon.net. []) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b74sm11061058qka.40.2018. for <iasa20@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:29:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
To: iasa20@ietf.org
Message-ID: <4483006c-1652-7340-19f8-8d0579af8213@cdt.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 18:29:13 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E1qap5kWmKsAkscdW6UVjoubCr9Oojbif"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/XT_3vfd3OWVFCW335mRrvWuusaI>
Subject: [Iasa20] Memo exploring options for IASA 2.0 models
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?iso-8859-1?q?Discussions_relating_to_reorganising_the_IETF_administrative_structures_in_the_so_called_=93IASA_2=2E0=94_project=2E?= <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:29:20 -0000


I am writing on behalf of the IASA 2.0 Design Team to update you on
progress since Singapore.

The Design Team and Alissa, Sean Turner, and Richard Barnes (ISOC Board
members) asked ISOC's tax law counsel at the law firm Morgan Lewis to
examine the options we are considering in a new IASA 2.0 structure, in
terms of governance, finances, and administrative complexity.

The response memo is attached, covering the spectrum of options from the
status quo to increasingly independent models. The memo covers four options:

1. Substantial independence: an independent 501(c)(3) org;
2. Significant independence: a 501(c)(3) Type 1 Supporting Org;
3. Weak independence: an LLC that is a "disregarded entity"; and,
4. Status quo: continuing as an activity of ISOC.

Note that the design team has some additional questions that we hope to
clarify including the implications of the public support test, board
composition and control, and potential costs (sunk/ongoing) of a
transition to each model. We'd like to hear from all of you as to your
thoughts, either in terms of clarification or if this analysis affects
which model you prefer.

If questions emerge around particular themes we can work with ISOC on

thank you,

Joe (writing on behalf of the DT)

Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org]
1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497
e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871