IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] I-D Action: draft-hall-iasa20-workshops-report-00.txt

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 21 March 2017 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36373129B1E for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-1T__4_1gCR for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87770129BCC for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D4BBE80; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:42:19 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AbSg3o2fyChG; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:42:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.100] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1B62BE8A; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:42:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1490110938; bh=UgBoTZ0QxtqpMP7eTXnkNQ9Y/p0WGShzG5O+vWzTEuw=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=YfBLDTHL0y0zB0iq5ID9ava9kS0U0FeDtDT4i2HOqRXI3GikQCyn4gjSNW9rgZcUi OAj0NY0WiN83Ztn5DPsb36nKqAuXdCAoB0oZtnQAwLJbHtuY0cljKpdbnQjt10daff jJqPTZ3teRjW3bnpspOBnVMKIATKHWLFCTjQzoWE=
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
References: <148941528136.16867.3807046327704023886@ietfa.amsl.com> <2938563f-6ad6-57a8-122f-805b8cf41ed5@gmail.com> <A3C09A9E-AB39-4ABD-8B0B-76C7F3249C45@cooperw.in> <m2var2ej66.wl-randy@psg.com>
Cc: iasa20@ietf.org
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <c438800d-7ce3-79aa-e8b6-a238a3ef29fc@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:42:17 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2var2ej66.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ov2UxLbF3hPQT12UN38wpoxJaweJ6Fwl9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/rVI95SKAZ0fGKO096B_FXF8Jc4A>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] I-D Action: draft-hall-iasa20-workshops-report-00.txt
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:44:55 -0000


On 21/03/17 15:36, Randy Bush wrote:
> another is the nomcom process, which has a bit of rationality as
> opposed to the popularity contests in organizations such as nanog.
> but i hope we're not reviewing that area of our structure in this
> pass.

I think I agree with Randy.

I do think this process might change the set of, or
the descriptions of, roles for which we ask nomcoms
to select people, but I do not think this process
is intended to or ought try change how nomcoms are
selected/operate etc.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email