[Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?

lachlan.andrew@gmail.com (Lachlan Andrew) Wed, 01 September 2010 04:58 UTC

From: lachlan.andrew@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:58:57 +0000
Subject: [Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?
In-Reply-To: <EF5EF2B13ED09B4F871D9A0DBCA463C20111870F@tk5ex14mbxc105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <8D9EBD48-531F-4FF2-9C0C-2D13AD89E2DD@nokia.com> <EA7E7B46-6350-4D39-9DFE-7C3D9773B2E6@ifi.uio.no> <4ABCAE6E-6437-49ED-AD01-00DD9F092F16@nokia.com> <BCCC2DF2-798D-450B-9603-136FEDFBA7D0@nokia.com> <EF5EF2B13ED09B4F871D9A0DBCA463C20111870F@tk5ex14mbxc105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=SpFhoE9-DK1+hk=k4vvWcUiv61CoWWtnugcr0@mail.gmail.com>
X-Date: Wed Sep 1 04:58:57 2010

Greetings Murari,

The ICCRG is part of the IRTF, not IETF.  Our review is just input to
the IETF's working group...

Cheers,
Lachlan

On 1 September 2010 13:41, Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Yes, I'll take a look at the final review and see if the doc needs to be updated. Hasn't IETF already reviewed it under ICCRG?
>
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@nokia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:24 AM
> To: iccrg@cs.ucl.ac.uk list; Injong Rhee; Murari Sridharan; Douglas Leith
> Cc: Michael Welzl; Thomas Narten
> Subject: Re: [Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?
>
> Hi,
>
> Tom Narten has pointed out that some US DOD requirements are referring to CUBIC and Compound, and that it would be good to have IETF-reviewed RFCs available for them to point to.
>
> I'd therefore like to ask again if the authors could update these documents so they can be taken on by the IETF TCPM WG?
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
> On 2010-6-3, at 16:12, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
>> Thanks - you guys are organized! :-)
>>
>> Authors, it seems clear that the token is with you if you want something to happen with regards to these proposals on the IETF side.
>>
>> Lars
>>
>> On 2010-6-3, at 16:02, Michael Welzl wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 3, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm wondering what the status of the ICCRG reviews of the various
>>>> high-speed TCP proposals is? IIRC, these three proposals were
>>>> supposed to hit TCPM after ICCRG had reviewed them:
>>>>
>>>> ? ? draft-rhee-tcpm-cubic
>>>
>>> Several reviews were made, suggestions were given to the authors, who
>>> haven't done anything for a long time now.
>>> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_cubic
>>>
>>>
>>>> ? ? draft-leith-tcp-htcp
>>>
>>> One review was made, suggestions were given to the author, who hasn't
>>> done anything for a long time now.
>>> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_htcp
>>>
>>>
>>>> ? ? draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp
>>>
>>> Several reviews were made, suggestions were given to the authors, who
>>> addressed them;
>>> this document was then (a long time ago) deemed ready for tossing it
>>> over to TCPM, but
>>> the authors have not pursued this activity so far.
>>> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_ctcp
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>
>> <smime.p7s><ATT00001..txt>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iccrg mailing list
> Iccrg@cs.ucl.ac.uk
> http://oakham.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/iccrg
>



-- 
Lachlan Andrew? Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures (CAIA)
Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/cv/landrew>
Ph +61 3 9214 4837