[Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?

[[e-mail] (Murari Sridharan)]

Sure, as I said earlier this year to Wes and Lars, we are ready to take this to tcpm, but after this review was forwarded to TCPM there was no activity around the high speed proposals may be because they were quite busy with TCP auth and other such proposals. 

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Lachlan Andrew [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:00 PM
To: Murari Sridharan
Cc: Lars Eggert; [e-mail] list
Subject: Re: [Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?

Greetings Murari,

The ICCRG is part of the IRTF, not IETF.  Our review is just input to the IETF's working group...

Cheers,
Lachlan

On 1 September 2010 13:41, Murari Sridharan <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Yes, I'll take a look at the final review and see if the doc needs to be updated. Hasn't IETF already reviewed it under ICCRG?
>
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:24 AM
> To: [e-mail] list; Injong Rhee; Murari Sridharan; Douglas 
> Leith
> Cc: Michael Welzl; Thomas Narten
> Subject: Re: [Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?
>
> Hi,
>
> Tom Narten has pointed out that some US DOD requirements are referring to CUBIC and Compound, and that it would be good to have IETF-reviewed RFCs available for them to point to.
>
> I'd therefore like to ask again if the authors could update these documents so they can be taken on by the IETF TCPM WG?
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
> On 2010-6-3, at 16:12, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
>> Thanks - you guys are organized! :-)
>>
>> Authors, it seems clear that the token is with you if you want something to happen with regards to these proposals on the IETF side.
>>
>> Lars
>>
>> On 2010-6-3, at 16:02, Michael Welzl wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 3, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm wondering what the status of the ICCRG reviews of the various 
>>>> high-speed TCP proposals is? IIRC, these three proposals were 
>>>> supposed to hit TCPM after ICCRG had reviewed them:
>>>>
>>>> ? ? draft-rhee-tcpm-cubic
>>>
>>> Several reviews were made, suggestions were given to the authors, 
>>> who haven't done anything for a long time now.
>>> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_cubic
>>>
>>>
>>>> ? ? draft-leith-tcp-htcp
>>>
>>> One review was made, suggestions were given to the author, who 
>>> hasn't done anything for a long time now.
>>> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_htcp
>>>
>>>
>>>> ? ? draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp
>>>
>>> Several reviews were made, suggestions were given to the authors, 
>>> who addressed them; this document was then (a long time ago) deemed 
>>> ready for tossing it over to TCPM, but the authors have not pursued 
>>> this activity so far.
>>> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_ctcp
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>
>> <smime.p7s><ATT00001..txt>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iccrg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://oakham.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/iccrg
>



--
Lachlan Andrew? Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures (CAIA) Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia <http://caia.swin.edu.au/cv/landrew>
Ph [phone]