[Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?

lars.eggert@nokia.com (Lars Eggert) Thu, 03 June 2010 14:10 UTC

From: lars.eggert@nokia.com
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:10:15 +0000
Subject: [Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?
In-Reply-To: <EA7E7B46-6350-4D39-9DFE-7C3D9773B2E6@ifi.uio.no>
References: <8D9EBD48-531F-4FF2-9C0C-2D13AD89E2DD@nokia.com> <EA7E7B46-6350-4D39-9DFE-7C3D9773B2E6@ifi.uio.no>
Message-ID: <4ABCAE6E-6437-49ED-AD01-00DD9F092F16@nokia.com>
X-Date: Thu Jun 3 14:10:15 2010

Thanks - you guys are organized! :-)

Authors, it seems clear that the token is with you if you want something to happen with regards to these proposals on the IETF side.

Lars

On 2010-6-3, at 16:02, Michael Welzl wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> 
> On Jun 3, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Lars Eggert wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm wondering what the status of the ICCRG reviews of the various  
>> high-speed TCP proposals is? IIRC, these three proposals were  
>> supposed to hit TCPM after ICCRG had reviewed them:
>> 
>> 	draft-rhee-tcpm-cubic
> 
> Several reviews were made, suggestions were given to the authors, who  
> haven't done anything for a long time now.
> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_cubic
> 
> 
>> 	draft-leith-tcp-htcp
> 
> One review was made, suggestions were given to the author, who hasn't  
> done anything for a long time now.
> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_htcp
> 
> 
>> 	draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp
> 
> Several reviews were made, suggestions were given to the authors, who  
> addressed them;
> this document was then (a long time ago) deemed ready for tossing it  
> over to TCPM, but
> the authors have not pursued this activity so far.
> More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_ctcp
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2490 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oakham.cs.ucl.ac.uk/pipermail/iccrg/attachments/20100603/275b4b1e/smime.bin
>From wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov  Thu Jun  3 14:14:40 2010
From: wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov (Eddy,
	Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP])
Date: Thu Jun  3 14:12:40 2010
Subject: [Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?
In-Reply-To: <EA7E7B46-6350-4D39-9DFE-7C3D9773B2E6@ifi.uio.no>
References: <8D9EBD48-531F-4FF2-9C0C-2D13AD89E2DD@nokia.com>
	<EA7E7B46-6350-4D39-9DFE-7C3D9773B2E6@ifi.uio.no>
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E6527062@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>

>-----Original Message-----
>From: iccrg-bounces@cs.ucl.ac.uk [mailto:iccrg-bounces@cs.ucl.ac.uk] On
>Behalf Of Michael Welzl
>Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:02 AM
>To: Lars Eggert
>Cc: iccrg@cs.ucl.ac.uk list
>Subject: Re: [Iccrg] review of high-speed proposals?
>
> ...
>
>> 	draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp
>
>Several reviews were made, suggestions were given to the authors, who
>addressed them;
>this document was then (a long time ago) deemed ready for tossing it
>over to TCPM, but
>the authors have not pursued this activity so far.
>More: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_ctcp


A consolidated review for CTCP was also sent to TCPM:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg04241.html

I don't recall any following discussion about it though in TCPM,
and we never had a poll for adoption as a WG item there.

--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems