Re: [icnrg] [IANA #1280061] expert review for draft-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering (ccnx)

["David R. Oran" <[e-mail]>]

See below - IANA does not manage the registries for NDN. The NDN community and NDN research project does.
___________________________
iDevice - please excuse typos.

> On Sep 28, 2023, at 7:49 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Hitoshi (cc: ICNRG),
> 
> Does the new version of the document (published today) address your concerns?
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering-06
> 
> There is an issue for us: the IANA Considerations section has removed the request to register four of the five entries in Table 2, but Table 2 itself hasn't been removed, and is labeled "TLV-TYPE number assignments for NDN," which seems to indicate an action for IANA.
> 
No, IANA is not needed to do assignments for NDN.

Thanks!

> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
>> On Tue Sep 12 05:58:50 2023, [e-mail] wrote:
>> Hi folks and pathsteering draft authors,
>> 
>> I reviewed the pathsteering draft and have couple of comments.
>> 
>> At first I'd like to ask about the following Table 2 mentioned in
>> section 3.3 (Path label encoding for NDN).
>> 
>> Flag    (Suggested) Value (hex)
>> T_PATH_LABEL    0x0A
>> T_PATH_LABEL_FLAGS      0x0B
>> T_PATH_LABEL_BITMAP     0x0D
>> T_PATH_LABEL_NEXTHOP_LABEL      0x0E
>> T_PATH_LABEL_HOP_COUNT  0x0F
>> 
>> Table 2: TLV-TYPE number assignments
>> 
>> Except T_PATH_LABEL, there are no explanation about these types in
>> this draft. What are these labels used? It is necessary to explain all
>> of these types and scenarios how they use.
>> Even though this section title is with NDN (not CCNx), you are asking
>> the IANA assignment for these five type values in CCNx registry. You
>> may want to move this table to a different section.
>> 
>> In IANA consideration section, the authors say;
>> "1. Please assign the value 0x0004 (if still available) for
>> T_PATH_LABEL in the CCNx Hop-by-Hop Types registry established by
>> [RFC8609]."
>> But 0x0004 is already reserved by rfc8609, meaning it is not
>> available. Instead you can request 0x000A. BTW, you mentioned
>> T_PATH_LABEL in Table 2. Are they same even though you assigned
>> different values in this section (0x0004) and Table 2 (0x0A)?
>> 
>> "4. Please create the CCNx Path Label Flags registry and assign the
>> values listed in Table 1. The registration procedure for this registry
>> should be "Specification Required" as defined in [RFC8126]."
>> My question is where the CCNx Path Label Flags are specified in a
>> CCNx packet? Under which TLV field, this new TLV field is encoded?
>> 
>> Going back to section 3.1 (Path label TLV), two type values,
>> T_RETURN_INVALID_PATH_LABEL and T_RETURN_MALFORMED_INTEREST, are
>> defined for interest return. But only T_RETURN_INVALID_PATH_LABEL is
>> mentioned in the IANA section.
>> 
>> I think it is necessary to revise the draft.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Hitoshi
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 5, 2023, at 3:36, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-
>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Hitoshi  (cc: ICNRG),
>>> 
>>> Sorry, looks like I didn't copy the list on my initial request!
>>> Adding them now.
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> Amanda
>>> 
>>> On Sun Sep 03 06:29:48 2023, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>> Dear Amanda,
>>>> 
>>>> I'll reply you before Sep. 14.
>>>> (Were your mail sent to ICNRG ML?)
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Hitoshi
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 1, 2023, at 9:52, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-
>>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Hitoshi (cc: ICNRG),
>>>>> 
>>>>> As a designated expert for the "CCNx Interest Return Code Types"
>>>>> registry, can you review the proposed registration in this document
>>>>> for us?
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering
>>>>> 
>>>>> The due date is September 14th.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If this is OK, when we're asked to implement the registry actions
>>>>> for
>>>>> this document, we'll make the registration at
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ccnx
>>>>> 
>>>>> With thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Amanda Baber
>>>>> IANA Operations Manager
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg