IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idna-update] emoji and security

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Wed, 14 March 2018 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CF7126BF0 for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81dmXs5I6Mff for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E126120047 for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.169.246] (29-196.icannmeeting.org [199.91.196.29]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 898EE2349C; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:00:43 +0100 (CET)
From: "Patrik =?utf-8?b?RsOkbHRzdHLDtm0=?=" <paf@frobbit.se>
To: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Cc: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>, idna-update@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:00:42 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6106)
Message-ID: <B2E689B0-51B2-4F2B-9397-F2006E83505D@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20180314144939.ehis5fndfn7x7qqm@sources.org>
References: <20180313093035.fcax6v3zmz3nv34r@nic.fr> <20180313201720.2C67F2286F17@ary.local> <20180314144939.ehis5fndfn7x7qqm@sources.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_92DEE20D-CE76-410C-8239-46C91C987CB8_="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/wtX1lyZr1XZdT_1Ma-yhpwK8ag8>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] emoji and security
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:00:49 -0000

On 14 Mar 2018, at 10:49, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:17:19PM -0400,
>  John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote
>  a message of 22 lines which said:
>
>> You know and I know that emoji domains are a bad idea for all sorts
>> of reasons.
>
> I said it was "illegal", from RFC 5892, which is not exactly the same thing.

The precise text is:

   DISALLOWED: Those that should clearly not be included in IDNs.
   Code points with this property value are not permitted in IDNs.

I.e. "not permitted".

   paf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email