IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 16 October 2017 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16831344FE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1iETQX-nsf5F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2561344FA for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2198; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1508166516; x=1509376116; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9EcediIyvB7bI3UmfbpKgqafpPDEWrIdV6WIGRL0qF0=; b=MGy0ojPNHUbkFFMJ3pOZ5wnVP2qj8agXrfMzbmcmlZs7pNHrSFsjkSvo Qgn1xy7s68HhceTD4cJh/fXdGvMce+uK+oAz7zIwtgGcC7acTOXJHWCYX LA1Bb6MSPffZXyA4QoHNT5tKvYUHZTctL6T1WjIKgBjzFfc3y8qlsZCJD A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C3AQB7yuRZ/4wNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg19kbicHg3OZUIF2mEMKGA2FFgIahDxDFAECAQEBAQEBAWsohR4BAQQBASEROhsCAQgYAgImAgICJQsVEAIEARKKHRCqT4InizIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGgWBDoIfggeDO4MqgzKBU4MTgmEFmGWIYwKHXY0MghSFdosMlUICERkBgTgBNiGBWXoVSYJkhF92AQGJQoERAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,387,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="312046115"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Oct 2017 15:08:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9GF8ZpP019924 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:08:35 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:08:34 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:08:34 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
Thread-Index: AQHTPsjVxGJfQz+0E0q1qb1k9J8+yqLiXoSAgARFE4A=
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:08:34 +0000
Message-ID: <D60A4396.CEE32%acee@cisco.com>
References: <1F4BD63B-3273-469E-A3C6-4365B56724EA@juniper.net> <BE322BD1-EFA4-4568-B524-24139591162E@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <BE322BD1-EFA4-4568-B524-24139591162E@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3F3F1173F95D9C4F979D87297D93AC05@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/6GVMer2w_ocw-pyTk8yoKwA-2WQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:08:40 -0000

Support.

On 10/13/17, 1:55 PM, "Idr on behalf of John G. Scudder"
<idr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

>Paging through the discussion so far, I see exactly one person, Job
>Snijders, has expressed what I interpret as support for publishing the
>document. I presume the authors support it, and nobody has expressed
>opposition. However, it would be quite helpful if there were more
>contributions, whether to say "ship it", or "needs more work", or
>whatever.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--John
>
>> On Oct 6, 2017, at 1:30 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> (This is the first of a series of WGLCs as we work to clear backlog. We
>>will stagger the WGLCs somewhat.)
>> 
>> A working group last call has been requested for
>>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14. Please reply to the list
>>with your comments. As usual note we cannot advance the draft without
>>participation from the group. Please get your comments in before October
>>20, 2017.
>> 
>> Authors, please confirm that any relevant IPR has been disclosed.
>> 
>> 
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_
>>draft-2Dietf-2Didr-2Dbgp-2Doptimal-2Droute-2Dreflection-2D14&d=DwICAg&c=H
>>AkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=hLt5iDJpw7ukqICc0hoT7A&m=2T8
>>sWKXOuk1R-CTDDPFM8HO_a6AbOHGOseJ81Ht9_4Q&s=yunFv1zXtd-bLp5IQGspvPZQYpLtAF
>>tcXdjv_vA4-rU&e= 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> --John
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email