Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 18 October 2017 16:11 UTC
Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369E1134293 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPHpaNt-k0ZM for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C5F6132E24 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id i124so10869469wmf.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=PAYYQX42HQJ0+gPPgKjcpKQN3qoJINVZf23yywOdYqc=; b=er/AdVZqW+XtcKxyzR12bJyv/pH8KTA4juIUpvVUtcUNOgZOUkdWsjj/wdPt4INsv0 388cyA+1Tf0Pr69SqR4pjp3GfwnVUstvXuaKpgGJn1F5W7zCC9XChEpXdtGyuqg1Cb6t Cm83Rn/nDc6Iwj4pVt/M3yDknlvSu2mbfV4fjx3x7qwkyFWqJnDPx78eNrYUNTFRihAm doXjI5468bpEEVOO4w9hVbRt+WwRMHNhSlBmPSqvKQyCXrzNcbHBMeQ9770SFfMB0GfR AVtHI7jjg6Ksxfg+v81XZ2094QeXLU2zMekgZSN/nUmghJ47UDULJp3diJyp1sAM+s4P mhbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PAYYQX42HQJ0+gPPgKjcpKQN3qoJINVZf23yywOdYqc=; b=neETi9z4LIDKLUiSJxkMA9OzzNldSxo++m/emC0zWB50N3xxPv07FALUc2eHLxmIbz KwBrkaBGaz0JzvPrIsfneslwaqOFSpgBbRbUUYoEN7Dy6tMmtxX913M6/p5LnCaJZS5d E9X6xUwm7qMWdD5A3dV7l+oegxfycFQcUbF8jZJuzzDr+/nWopTQ0VWtIQuIBbtxuf+q hdchdTggT0Oi+Zx4LHEYpicQR/gn2wfsPjnwQM4a8oZmCexQ2unMEVmTThz0Nyuq5n4t SEolYqdpI+H4sI9+JkDYWSRtE4ubZtQ1JWrYTA6IuopXDrVsvLCplymfjqUSZeGV34k0 IokA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUbTn4u8UW8a0/d5p0sXsnlGEnqyVUVRJZufqFE8LyKKPIeeawm j/0IW4WqVg5qwjUvGHctLNyfOb+kflPgiMim5NM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+T6ErR1+xqpbDloVGb+UHCWAFXLCccM6JNNF4SeI8ajcDRPXObjUbFPJAUKHBB5ZAOnOOcFCKv1HUrdTCbE8jc=
X-Received: by 10.28.95.10 with SMTP id t10mr6778679wmb.72.1508343076668; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.146.135 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AC8407B8-F59B-4945-AB3E-CBEED52E8AC5@juniper.net>
References: <1F4BD63B-3273-469E-A3C6-4365B56724EA@juniper.net> <AC8407B8-F59B-4945-AB3E-CBEED52E8AC5@juniper.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:11:15 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DqQpE8RQ67PcrwpC0xDFeksbEqg
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=jRtacTLmfphHmDEFBq9mi58OTaTJPGDDDz-jK61JkOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148fb0a48ca7f055bd47d4d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/REQn-0RilpJIhHlyoSULrQlbY28>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:11:22 -0000
Hi, > There is an unresolved question from Randy Bush as to whether the document should really be > Standards Track or some other status (Informational and BCP were both mentioned). I explained the rationale for keeping it as Standards Track document. There is also recent outstanding question from Randy supposedly questioning the name of section 4.3. I personally do not see anything wrong with the current name. Thx, R. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:57 PM, John G. Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote: > An update on this WGLC. > > Tl;dr: Before we proceed forward we need to see the promised IPR > declaration from Cisco, we need to hear back from Stephane about IPR, and > we need to close on the question Randy raised regarding document status. > > 1. IPR > > Serpil Bayraktar let me know a few days ago that Cisco intends to disclose > IPR. The disclosure hasn't been filed yet, we will not progress the > document until it has been filed and the WG has an opportunity to consider > the filing. I would like to encourage the WG to wait until the filing is > done before discussing further -- while we wait you may want to pass the > time reviewing the IETF's policy on what is, and is not, in-scope for us to > consider when discussing IPR in our work. > > Authors Robert Raszuk, Bruno Decraene, Eric Aman, Kevin Wang, and Adam > Chappell have said they didn't know of any IPR. Christian Cassar said "I > was not aware of any IPR. I will work with Serpil and we will get back." > Stephane Litkowski hasn't answered. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id= > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection > > 2. Other > > Support from Job Snijders, Nick Hilliard, Rajiv Asati, Serpil Bayraktar, > Manish Bhardwaj, Keyur Patel, Jeff Tantsura, Acee Lindem > > Review by Job Snijders, largely about route recursion, led to a discussion > and update to the document. > > Note that much of the support was expressed before the IPR issue came up, > and it's the individuals' prerogative to change their minds if they see > fit. Support was for version -15 of the document, though, or at least was > expressed subsequent to the discussion and publication of -15. > > There is an unresolved question from Randy Bush as to whether the document > should really be Standards Track or some other status (Informational and > BCP were both mentioned). > > Thanks, > > --John > > > > On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:30 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > (This is the first of a series of WGLCs as we work to clear backlog. We > will stagger the WGLCs somewhat.) > > > > A working group last call has been requested for > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14. Please reply to the list > with your comments. As usual note we cannot advance the draft without > participation from the group. Please get your comments in before October > 20, 2017. > > > > Authors, please confirm that any relevant IPR has been disclosed. > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools. > ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Didr-2Dbgp-2Doptimal-2Droute- > 2Dreflection-2D14&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=hLt5iDJpw7ukqICc0hoT7A&m=2T8sWKXOuk1R-CTDDPFM8HO_ > a6AbOHGOseJ81Ht9_4Q&s=yunFv1zXtd-bLp5IQGspvPZQYpLtAFtcXdjv_vA4-rU&e= > > > > Thanks, > > > > --John > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr >
- [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-r… John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Erik.Aman
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Adam Chappell
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)
- [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-ref… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Kevin F Wang
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Keyur Patel
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Christian Cassar
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder