Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
"Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)" <serpil@cisco.com> Fri, 13 October 2017 18:37 UTC
Return-Path: <serpil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A41134225 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKMkkim3RmOf for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB006132F8F for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10090; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1507919844; x=1509129444; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=uotBfEzK8nY9qahhXwKqoA1gUI4T/e6RKcU6IGyniSw=; b=aaUGXcb8OowZWOc7sdauvQcL6xX1lOPE7QPl2kyzoju2zcArRfmEnQ/Q uppEc5wk3i8sEuyLrkODRaNB5TpVsGQDhlWgGwMCsxhqnSl0Yleo32QeO IPCb1owJm8YzfjLdPBR2vLdClkHIRBMOzGtAHTIpKwN4cCqAKYzZK/CTM c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A1AQCDBuFZ/4UNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9wZG4nB4Nzih+PMoFUIpBwhT+CFAoYAQmFGQIahDw/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohR0BAQEBAwEBIUsbAgEIEQMBAigDAgICJQsUCQgCBAESiTlkEKwOgicmiwwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYMtggeDOysLgnSDMoFzFoJdL4IyBZhkiGICh12NDIIUhXaLCJVCAhEZAYE4AR84gVl6FUktAYI2hF92AQGJXYERAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,372,1503360000"; d="scan'208,217";a="310569209"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Oct 2017 18:37:23 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (xch-rcd-013.cisco.com [173.37.102.23]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9DIbNpt017267 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:37:23 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:37:22 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:37:22 -0500
From: "Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)" <serpil@cisco.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
Thread-Index: AQHTPsjWZL+rNmbNDUu/ZTiyQigBOKLib0iA//+WNwA=
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:37:22 +0000
Message-ID: <A31589B3-87EF-4603-9929-C135428457E2@cisco.com>
References: <1F4BD63B-3273-469E-A3C6-4365B56724EA@juniper.net> <BE322BD1-EFA4-4568-B524-24139591162E@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <BE322BD1-EFA4-4568-B524-24139591162E@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.25.0.170815
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.155.69.125]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A31589B387EF46039929C135428457E2ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/l8PT3qvvS6YgfYTGPml5sps4g1Q>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:37:27 -0000
I support it. Serpil From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> Date: Friday, October 13, 2017 at 10:56 AM To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14 Paging through the discussion so far, I see exactly one person, Job Snijders, has expressed what I interpret as support for publishing the document. I presume the authors support it, and nobody has expressed opposition. However, it would be quite helpful if there were more contributions, whether to say "ship it", or "needs more work", or whatever. Thanks, --John On Oct 6, 2017, at 1:30 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net<mailto:jgs@juniper.net>> wrote: Hi All, (This is the first of a series of WGLCs as we work to clear backlog. We will stagger the WGLCs somewhat.) A working group last call has been requested for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14. Please reply to the list with your comments. As usual note we cannot advance the draft without participation from the group. Please get your comments in before October 20, 2017. Authors, please confirm that any relevant IPR has been disclosed. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Didr-2Dbgp-2Doptimal-2Droute-2Dreflection-2D14&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=hLt5iDJpw7ukqICc0hoT7A&m=2T8sWKXOuk1R-CTDDPFM8HO_a6AbOHGOseJ81Ht9_4Q&s=yunFv1zXtd-bLp5IQGspvPZQYpLtAFtcXdjv_vA4-rU&e= Thanks, --John _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org<mailto:Idr@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-r… John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Erik.Aman
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Adam Chappell
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)
- [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-ref… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Kevin F Wang
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Keyur Patel
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Christian Cassar
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] IPR in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rou… John G. Scudder