Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com> Sat, 30 May 2015 07:37 UTC
Return-Path: <haoweiguo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B2D1A005F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2015 00:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_KhVc36LIaW for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2015 00:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F68E1A005C for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 00:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BWR36035; Sat, 30 May 2015 07:36:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:36:56 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.89]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 30 May 2015 15:36:45 +0800
From: Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
Thread-Index: AdCUgStIhDpb4dxxSaCmWd/Taovc3AADBOYAAAiqVoAAevfMYAEDjgjL
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 07:36:45 +0000
Message-ID: <DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F86E90C@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <006f01d09482$17c489c0$474d9d40$@ndzh.com> <D1849CBA.99EC1%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> <D184C8BF.1EF9C%acee@cisco.com>, <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84754656@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84754656@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.23.94]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F86E90Cnkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/C2Wc5MFzmrk2elB-g4eNgIVNaOM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 07:37:02 -0000
Support this adoption. I think BGP LS extension is necessary to carry "Extended Administrative Group" IGP TE information. Thanks, weiguo ________________________________ From: Idr [idr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Qin Wu [bill.wu@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 11:36 To: Acee Lindem (acee); Jeff Tantsura; Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5) Agree with Acee and support this draft. -Qin 发件人: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Acee Lindem (acee) 发送时间: 2015年5月22日 23:54 收件人: Jeff Tantsura; Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5) I support with one comment. In the future, I’m wondering if we could standardize the BGP Link State encoding in the corresponding IGP documents? It seems like it would be possible since it is simply the TLV mapping and the IANA code point(s). Thanks, Acee From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com<mailto:jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>> Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 11:45 AM To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>, "idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5) Support as co-author Cheers, Jeff From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 4:26 AM To: "idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>> Subject: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5) This begins a 2 week Working Group adoption for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution. You can find the draft at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution/ This draft proposes a new BGP-LS As MPLS-TE network grows, administrative Groups advertised as a fixed-length 32-bit Bitmask is quite constraining. "Extended Administrative Group" IGP TE extensions sub-TLV defined in [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>] is introduced to provide for additional administrative groups (link colors) beyond the current limit of 32. The EAG TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups when a node wants to advertise more than 32 colors for a link. The EAG TLV is optional. The format and semantics of the 'value' fields in EAG TLVs correspond to the format and semantics of value fields in IGP extension sub-TLVs, defined in [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>]. +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+ | TLV Code | Description | IS-IS | Defined in: | | Point | | TLV/Sub-TLV | | +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+ | xxxx | Extended | 22/xx | [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>] | | | Admin Group | | | +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+ Please in your comments include “support” or “no support” for this draft. Sue Hares and John Scudder.
- [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Qin Wu
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Mach Chen
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Haoweiguo
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag… Susan Hares