IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Sat, 30 May 2015 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDED1A9302 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2015 00:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8L11QUtLfRZb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2015 00:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD2B1A92EA for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 00:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BTC89358; Sat, 30 May 2015 07:03:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.73) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:03:28 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.243]) by SZXEMA414-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 30 May 2015 15:03:25 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
Thread-Index: AdCUgStIhDpb4dxxSaCmWd/Taovc3AGJT80A
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 07:03:24 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28B46FDD4@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <006f01d09482$17c489c0$474d9d40$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <006f01d09482$17c489c0$474d9d40$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28B46FDD4SZXEMA510MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/D83qwQIeqKRUpOujPd5n4cGHc0Y>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 07:03:35 -0000

I read the draft and it's useful, so support the adoption.

BTW, also agree with Acee's comment.

Best regards,
Mach

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 7:26 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)

This begins a 2 week Working Group adoption for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution.   You can find the draft at:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution/

This draft proposes a new BGP-LS


   As MPLS-TE network grows, administrative Groups advertised as a

   fixed-length 32-bit Bitmask is quite constraining.  "Extended

   Administrative Group" IGP TE extensions sub-TLV defined in [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>]

   is introduced to provide for additional administrative groups (link

   colors) beyond the current limit of 32.



   The EAG TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups when a

   node wants to advertise more than 32 colors for a link.  The EAG TLV

   is optional.  The format and semantics of the 'value' fields in EAG

   TLVs correspond to the format and semantics of value fields in IGP

   extension sub-TLVs, defined in [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>].



   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+

   |  TLV Code  |     Description     |     IS-IS    |   Defined in:   |

   |    Point   |                     |  TLV/Sub-TLV |                 |

   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+

   |    xxxx    |       Extended      |     22/xx    |    [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>]    |

   |            |      Admin Group    |              |                 |

   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+

Please in your comments include "support" or "no support" for this draft.

Sue Hares and John Scudder.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email