IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DD41A8AB2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMKtNZahqAZZ for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE7051A8A0F for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2729; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1433433351; x=1434642951; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=LaYF6KaTVqwTlf8ixqcwtFclGtcoOll4Cu+XC0JrIBo=; b=IDP49hjxsOESDViIBxp8ub2g32mP+A24voRzaAgJkXZQhJD++bs28Rue MoQ5XIBrVk2rpzXGnSoR1XWlFIGbZrk5RCxLn3zywIIoNLQORE0mQFQOV vP8Gi2GU56p9bqS+24nWCm/VxZFN+35a7CUWbiRs+Ps7ToOD4USA3neUb M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AvBADyc3BV/4MNJK1bgkVLgTIGvj8Jh1ECgTg4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEEHVwQAgEIBDsHMhQRAQEEAQ0FiC3bSAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLQ4UGB4QtBZBbgj+LJJdQJII6gT1vgUaBAQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,553,1427760000"; d="scan'208,217";a="156274781"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2015 15:55:51 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t54FtpRI013812 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:55:51 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.5]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:55:50 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
Thread-Index: AdCUgStIhDpb4dxxSaCmWd/Taovc3AADBOYAAAiqVoACjdkKgA==
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:55:50 +0000
Message-ID: <D195EC63.B4EFC%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <006f01d09482$17c489c0$474d9d40$@ndzh.com> <D1849CBA.99EC1%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> <D184C8BF.1EF9C%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D184C8BF.1EF9C%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D195EC63B4EFCaretanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/JUsTPb7-SK_pyBn9T3vchZBsl1g>
Cc: Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:55:53 -0000

On 5/22/15, 11:53 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:

In the future, I’m wondering if we could standardize the BGP Link State encoding in the corresponding IGP documents? It seems like it would be possible since it is simply the TLV mapping and the  IANA code point(s).

I definitely agree with this too.

We just need to make sure that the IGP documents are reviewed in idr as well.  Besides communicating (sending an e-mail, presenting at a meeting, etc.) that a draft with BGP LS extensions exists somewhere else, I would also like to see a joint WGLC.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email