IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 22 May 2015 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FAF1A1BAF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A8P1c5JSEky8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052931A1B7C for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17679; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432310038; x=1433519638; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=YDZ3+DlAnOSkdeDF6I7q5iMm+puHy3dBcsPbaq3bKDc=; b=jpLl5usxLEJ9CqYOnq1SN3gvHLDwnzXxTX9uO5kWEoUidlhBrvXa0NCy XLt9UHA5nHdphkl87rXLCTN8MsYuTRmVB9o2Pjl+IRW5Y3Ntopkq0KoHa Ud9uWk2C3KDgCV4OdlB6EDNoZmwPN645NVYcuaQ8kwAtJ2fkbvzxa1mhJ c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ChBQBUUF9V/5xdJa1cgkVLVF4GgxmxSI4NggyFdwIcgR1MAQEBAQEBgQuEIgEBAQQdBgpcAgEIEQMBAigDAgICMBQJCAEBBAESiCwNr2WkDQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLOoQtRw0LgmiBRQWGaYldgjyENYZXgSk+gzGONYNZI4I7gT1vgQRCgQEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,476,1427760000"; d="scan'208,217";a="421914925"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 May 2015 15:53:57 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4MFrvD2006138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 May 2015 15:53:57 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.97]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:53:57 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
Thread-Index: AdCUgStIhDpb4dxxSaCmWd/Taovc3AADBOYAAAiqVoA=
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:53:56 +0000
Message-ID: <D184C8BF.1EF9C%acee@cisco.com>
References: <006f01d09482$17c489c0$474d9d40$@ndzh.com> <D1849CBA.99EC1%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1849CBA.99EC1%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.202]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D184C8BF1EF9Caceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RnkfIufS-pBK-Fir8p1vs4kLvFM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:54:00 -0000

I support with one comment.

In the future, I’m wondering if we could standardize the BGP Link State encoding in the corresponding IGP documents? It seems like it would be possible since it is simply the TLV mapping and the  IANA code point(s).

Thanks,
Acee

From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com<mailto:jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>>
Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 11:45 AM
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>, "idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)

Support as co-author

Cheers,
Jeff

From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>
Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 4:26 AM
To: "idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)

This begins a 2 week Working Group adoption for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution.   You can find the draft at:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution/

This draft proposes a new BGP-LS


   As MPLS-TE network grows, administrative Groups advertised as a

   fixed-length 32-bit Bitmask is quite constraining.  "Extended

   Administrative Group" IGP TE extensions sub-TLV defined in [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>]

   is introduced to provide for additional administrative groups (link

   colors) beyond the current limit of 32.



   The EAG TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups when a

   node wants to advertise more than 32 colors for a link.  The EAG TLV

   is optional.  The format and semantics of the 'value' fields in EAG

   TLVs correspond to the format and semantics of value fields in IGP

   extension sub-TLVs, defined in [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>].



   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+

   |  TLV Code  |     Description     |     IS-IS    |   Defined in:   |

   |    Point   |                     |  TLV/Sub-TLV |                 |

   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+

   |    xxxx    |       Extended      |     22/xx    |    [RFC7308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308>]    |

   |            |      Admin Group    |              |                 |

   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+

Please in your comments include “support” or “no support” for this draft.

Sue Hares and John Scudder.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email