Re: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16)

Hi WG,

I support publication, the extension is useful and the document clear.

Just a few nits -

- Expand LSP, PW, iBGP, eBGP on first use
- s/Type: 1032/Type: 1032 (early allocated by IANA)/
- Section 4, you have -

   The S-BFD Discriminators TLV can only be added to the BGP-LS
   Attribute associated with the Node NLRI that originates the
   corresponding underlying IGP TLV/sub-TLV as described below.

and then the next paragraph -

   When the node is not running any of the IGPs but running a protocol
   like BGP, ...

I suggest removing the "only" as it adds to confusion as non-IGP cases
are allowed as well.

- Check if RFC7883 and RFC7884 are better suited as informative.

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:14 AM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>
> This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16).
>
> This is the second WG LC call since the initial call had only 1 reponse besides the authors.
>
>
>
> You can access the draft at:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions/
>
>
>
> We have a report of draft has 1 implementation from Nokia:
>
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions%20implementations
>
>
>
> We are missing IPR statements from Sam Aldrin and Greg Minsky.
>
> The co-authors should encourage these authors to submit IPR statements
>
> by Tuesday (11/3/2020).
>
>
>
> In your responses please consider the following questions:
>
> a) Do you know any issues with this technology?
>
> b) Will this technology help BGP-LS deployments?
>
> c) Is this draft ready for publication?
>
>
>
> If you know of any additional implementations, please
>
> send email to the WG chairs or respond to this email
>
> with the information.
>
>
>
> Cheers, Susan Hares
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr