IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024) - Extended to 4/19/2024

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Sat, 13 April 2024 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65062C14F5F6 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 02:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.336
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.441, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g9-Yp1jMXIac for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 02:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [46.182.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A413C14F5F2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 02:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crumpet.local (unknown [89.101.70.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netability.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD392B062F; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:07:17 +0100 (IST)
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <DM6PR08MB48573863C5259A0DF98C335CB3042@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <4ccf10b9-eff3-d99a-19fe-8d61336542ca@foobar.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:07:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.60
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR08MB48573863C5259A0DF98C335CB3042@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D1FDB7CE5E0C6FD0DE86E6D8"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/EU2W3VEzhN7xhuTu0-oHLKPNYHQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024) - Extended to 4/19/2024
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:07:28 -0000

I'd like to see this draft published as an RFC. The proposal addresses a 
real-world operational failure mode which causes persistent and 
difficult-to-diagnose connectivity issues.

Nick

Susan Hares wrote on 12/04/2024 16:16:
>
> Greetings:
>
> A great deal of good discussion has occurred regarding 
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer during the WG LC.
>
> However, we need additional comments on this draft prior to completing 
> the WG LC.  To enable this discussion, I an extending the WG LC an 
> extra week to 4/19/2024.
>
> Cheerily, Sue Hares
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email