IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024) - Extended to 4/19/2024

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 22 April 2024 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02328C14F680 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8BmltEnrKrzD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE9AC14F600 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d88a869ce6so64786241fa.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; t=1713801251; x=1714406051; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PQ7r+X3ftIWih0merPWz6ErkCuGtmPsFalGs7c0QuTM=; b=WcnoCX+qxHIK27HOzi/3cL/myi/yoH7XGq9vwceRpk5dQ6dFvffVxoPOFX5TN8RN8P bjpN5My8ukeMGvXZUslz8wEmKX0I65A8I7huYA/rHB/uV1wgn2p0SkG+bRx99EnmbOU/ DG39B6LP+1+ACZZnQVPMDbm9/5hBA3N1D6srtI5LAe+4mfI3gciWhGU3Osx8znlwih3f SnJUwDlrUzOcgSGigCNg5cjkNguH2OBAZYjYVmVKIcby+H0wt0trQIRz42bkYQPp6hMQ Ka7N3AaKkWQOgq6wfivMnVBpJKWAbzRn9Z3kZOK/NxToV3t+/VAf43vW9G5eeTI671m0 6ACA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713801251; x=1714406051; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=PQ7r+X3ftIWih0merPWz6ErkCuGtmPsFalGs7c0QuTM=; b=G/iXlcUZubJjdPzJWf1kD7l9EyeKLFxQaoBh/sGijkfpFvPqh7Iyl9O4Ri1zVNVCJx amRsBba3fmqD27rKIoTqQe3Hnh0Y3o2fPaPHf0xVBOfuo8w4tKFcRxK6EfzXoXSwfwQh XqlyAo4ruET50Nv+pQQ6ZI7SMBZxCElkY/JSbR7xIRzNsn4Ac/ZvyXrDr1kaKyicSzz1 sx2UHL6posnyUQ5mBUACRJFStm35LG7ILetBSAIHBDJC+nuo+y8lOIjB8gr6m6I22G3S kW6zfbvpVCdV3d8F/fOIEQZXOch7gtzKptVqWCXRQBkBAfpEG12aslDYR489c8m60zTd 0DYg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUs+c4UTi1SXdXsCJCjfdw+L9UmY/P6slPkytrDqX70sZKWfjCKCezegaeCEMWaa6jMP//M/oBBc7rQssk=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxwfLL3aiQ6CA1uybzexGyNa0qM8OzUbJmTudjVc33MhRM/Ojci 1Q4NqBH3Hy85+qA/DEwaRo5naRRddhC2/TLQ+PLf54e2pZv6bVL9PaQroHVET4ppv//y60MVQn0 jZ5HOsw97bVO7fbpDAe7lHPn8t9IwFo34jhrb0cn0al2y9bl90QhWVQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG8xQiZyTb1dcmV7hgzFfzpVo6aa2+AmtVddFatnpO6NtQPAuNnx63xuxlRkZxtmIgWtSsa5cIIuAiUPJSBIJA=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9e0c:0:b0:2d8:dd28:8748 with SMTP id e12-20020a2e9e0c000000b002d8dd288748mr7815981ljk.1.1713801251400; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR08MB48573863C5259A0DF98C335CB3042@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CABNhwV073u1SGPW6scLAHdsTHpy8qsKdqguYo6KpS5rbhjjpDQ@mail.gmail.com> <ZiHrY8ww0CULyLvZ@shrubbery.net> <CAOj+MMEwXJS6xbKfk69FARv_pCjx9u7Xg_c1TgCOyzuf81e1jw@mail.gmail.com> <53A365F5-589B-4303-92D6-17110386A25B@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <53A365F5-589B-4303-92D6-17110386A25B@pfrc.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:54:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHmGLF1EzgVUrh+kiOV0Rp2GngdBdtVsVpNAZXnY-HOTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: John Heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce57b70616b1727a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/lSp8oUwtfIIEV4K_4C8-I5YN8Gk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024) - Extended to 4/19/2024
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:54:18 -0000

> A fully acked zero window.

Yes - you are correct - I did not fully spell it out, but both solutions
react on too long lasting zero window from the "stuck" peer.

Thx,
R.

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:34 PM Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

>
>
> > On Apr 19, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> >
> > > this does not match the problem correctly, as I interpret that
> description.
> > > TCP Acks are received for data that has been sent, after which no
> further
> > > data can be sent and therefore there are no further acks to be
> received.
> >
> > If previous data sent by TCP is ACKed what would stop TCP to send more
> data ? Note that we are obviously talking about case where there is data in
> the sendbuffer.
>
> A fully acked zero window.
>
> -- Jeff
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email