IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024) - Extended to 4/19/2024

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 19 April 2024 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB383C14CE53 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2A7CKKI1pg9v for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D212BC14CE3B for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-571d8daff86so418280a12.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; t=1713532372; x=1714137172; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aWWTu7hsKiimkxVUlg2jheVKFmSSihJdY68FzrIYJP8=; b=aFu5m2bpog0Bh+q09KTeIjwnsyDximN4JlGSmzwLGqjlAwi8/LqVJY3gJFdetYBxXv QjPW0pp78wMew5uUcFS+vy8ijJCiJMIXWP9PxYr/wMMCerMP1YqEwujV0IyWJ7SE4hu3 skte7kjyIRWNf+5DdkrIx41lBrPMg5DIu4uZGKVrTX+C5K/EQBsSTvsosSlSIC1tenHc 0bZrxLk19DxwOKlnBYTS5yjCEUoH/iDXWYsgtchmHteGu23I2Dm6uwhPWGgaSDchyOqa ah4KxH4oFR0NIfqB8jXraGhIfyNe8rsb8V5mxx0KjQvUzwloX8sGKuBXVqseqkmjb1Ai wgaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713532372; x=1714137172; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=aWWTu7hsKiimkxVUlg2jheVKFmSSihJdY68FzrIYJP8=; b=DcotD0xLHY6YqRrCCRPEu6W+Lvwew+YoOPME1w0X3QJIwUOwSZdSVWGeIc+ur6N3NL 0TF+JbOm9XA+UrfzX8bHhHeI3c4wKiVWXfOwQ3bGUCMdR78KfvgzdivICH6kWVf9oHbM HpoHejHogxFKkFgli41cRN77v6tR9pIqOaqGXxG5GrW6gKoOzAzTVG+ovugzBVpbj49S Mr8M/GvV/X9ZsrHGbo/J/xI4GjdLlnmcNJCAM87HoDYoJSkppq/undVgijwiNfov3Gjb qltwn4u48I0aXiT3IkVypynS+DuwIItaYIKNQnwWShu0+9WGEsJj2tY3Jj0VtpWn4TNB f74A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUGSYRj5ZUn5FA0z2mFfjg56bl0tKlXLVmoogz0DR+n86WJLfPf31S+SbKI2za4Xe4ui7jxbeM0ki5sNe0=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw4riLrA3lHWYZwkKHYaW0gAfVBjuaOYmBTDu3+yo7kLDC4s96e tdAhxnCJnFukNwAtIfoo/HqtNDQyKu44LLp30ZCwhy7tn0leu1OapC+LOrBqhn0G1W05lVorfHM wr06lv+JEZap7qggSKKcxx0XLPTQ90z9QBN4oeQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE0Au9tbp9rCh97FMEvXc+KWiMwVH8Ly5X4pQRtyWsBlj4TLeuiaYkoEDirz7lX9wtU3ryBKdfQJWicHLVHtKI=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:a69a:0:b0:56e:2daf:1ed9 with SMTP id e26-20020a50a69a000000b0056e2daf1ed9mr1573670edc.23.1713532372075; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR08MB48573863C5259A0DF98C335CB3042@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <AM4PR07MB314043BCF3BC57892534695BA00D2@AM4PR07MB3140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <ZiJZ-Lfd9kmG3LVC@shrubbery.net>
In-Reply-To: <ZiJZ-Lfd9kmG3LVC@shrubbery.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:12:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEUHbz1pO=4+DohjRL5rQQ-dkfVtyw2aDY24iWkyB-iuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005969c0061672d839"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/xxikVDZq4ErNiYKrEkBSxCPQKGM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024) - Extended to 4/19/2024
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:13:13 -0000

No.

This is not adoption call.

This is WGLC

Thx,
R.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 1:48 PM heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> wrote:

> Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 09:51:36AM +0000, tom petch:
> > I think that the draft underestimates substantially the changes needed
> to the base specification of the FSM.  The idea is fine but the details are
> lacking and that may lead to divergent implementations of what is a rather
> important protocol.
>
> Aren't those details which are or can be resolved after adoption?
> Including
> the possibility of abandonment.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email