Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Sun, 18 November 2012 01:48 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F84E21F863F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:48:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wVxdKIad5MJL for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:48:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85D621F863A for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:48:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=64.112.195.202;
Received: from SKH2012HPLT (unverified [64.112.195.202]) by hickoryhill-consulting.com (SurgeMail 5.2a) with ESMTP id 89927-1945496 for multiple; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:48:09 -0500
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@juniper.net>, "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <20121114180611.17620.93258.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B0B4E04E-A9E6-46DC-B8D5-B183ED44B3D5@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <B0B4E04E-A9E6-46DC-B8D5-B183ED44B3D5@juniper.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:48:07 -0500
Message-ID: <004c01cdc52e$c2035c20$460a1460$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQISjlPaKXKo7+qdMrxHPjL5B4IsvQHb1ptdl1ZiCTA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
X-IsFriend: <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:48:14 -0000
<chair hat off> +1 support Sue Hares -----Original Message----- From: John G. Scudder [mailto:jgs@juniper.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 1:17 PM To: idr@ietf. org Cc: Susan Hares Subject: Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt Hi, Nobody responded to my note of November 8 ("Deprecating path attributes DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID"). Accordingly, I've submitted the below tiny Internet Draft. The substantive text of the draft is: 1. Introduction As of this writing the BGP Path Attributes registry maintained by IANA contains entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID. The first of these is associated with [draft-ietf-idr-bgp-dpa-05], an Internet Draft that was abandoned in 1996. The latter are associated with [RFC1863], an RFC that was reclassified as Historic in 2005. Neither of these specifications is in use now, nor ever was. 2. IANA Considerations This document requests IANA to mark the BGP Path Attributes registry entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID as "Deprecated". The rest is boilerplate, references, etc. I would like to ask the WG to adopt the draft. Since the draft is so trivial, I would like to also request a WGLC, to run in parallel. Since many WG members will be on holiday for part of next week, let's have the call for adoption + WGLC end on December 3. Please send any comments before December 3. Also, regarding the out-of-the-ordinary expedited WGLC: If there's any disagreement whatsoever (with the content or wording of the draft, its adoption, or indeed the expedited procedure itself), let's have only the call for adoption end on December 3, and then we can do a normal WGLC when appropriate. Thanks, --John (wearing two hats) Begin forwarded message: > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt > Date: November 14, 2012 1:06:11 PM EST > To: jgs@bgp.nu > Cc: jgs@juniper.net > > > A new version of I-D, draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by John Scudder and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Filename: draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal > Revision: 00 > Title: Deprecation of BGP Path Attributes DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID > Creation date: 2012-11-14 > WG ID: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 2 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt > Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00 > > > Abstract: > This document requests IANA to deprecate several BGP path attributes, > associated with an abandoned Internet Draft and a Historic RFC, > respectively. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat
- [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-sc… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Jie Dong
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Chandra Appanna
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat)
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Jon Mitchell
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Danny McPherson
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… David Farmer