Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Wed, 14 November 2012 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C61221F8755 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:19:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBI-fTc3E7uT for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B487521F8749 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:19:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w11so431125bku.31 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:19:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+x3LnH83NiDxD2ryZ876GOgNGf+5POdIFgQ24G4AhW0=; b=k7f7usgpE0Ee31woB0/KIFpKmTiXlXFHKUHj/eAdMfbGDToB/xICfMB7RZHakopr9c cRb+da2zinM/kW3VP8n/K3P9NhRbYKy5SKWKktv59TupedZJ8Cc6G+AcQXE3G8cDmlKB j/O7YG1lspKK1CPTvQtsFM+3/C8FL4oCFbHu0DwDP08Ygjk520eETrhe7oQkyb1XKA0C TJAUMTDDX6GlgKn161FIlWR/LiQ1Fwb7G9kk6GMZwEREj5CndrcDEc/1263IeJg7vq4P eqdc0s2UwdBl++T/LWWHkyVoHh5A6TC4bS6n04p2dvrnF5jg0NFx1ytfjxFeiVbsDkFN b/xQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.150.210 with SMTP id z18mr9269189bkv.53.1352924354574; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:19:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.66.83 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:19:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <EA17E74E9EB02B49B15CE5886A386F62150F1551@xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com>
References: <B0B4E04E-A9E6-46DC-B8D5-B183ED44B3D5@juniper.net> <EA17E74E9EB02B49B15CE5886A386F62150F1551@xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:19:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH1iCiqcV8Ebmd9Rp1yuROQ6qnAZh2DR0GLBkw_9+pd898aqoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
To: "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015175cae4a8ff8ca04ce7a3f34"
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:19:17 -0000

Support both for both.

Brian

P.S. If only more IDs were as short. :-)

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Keyur Patel (keyupate)
<keyupate@cisco.com>wrote:

> Support for both.
>
> Regards,
> Keyur
>
> On 11/14/12 10:16 AM, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Nobody responded to my note of November 8 ("Deprecating path attributes
> >DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID"). Accordingly, I've submitted
> >the below tiny Internet Draft. The substantive text of the draft is:
> >
> >1.  Introduction
> >
> >   As of this writing the BGP Path Attributes registry maintained by
> >   IANA contains entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH /
> >   CLUSTER_ID.  The first of these is associated with
> >   [draft-ietf-idr-bgp-dpa-05], an Internet Draft that was abandoned in
> >   1996.  The latter are associated with [RFC1863], an RFC that was
> >   reclassified as Historic in 2005.  Neither of these specifications is
> >   in use now, nor ever was.
> >
> >
> >2.  IANA Considerations
> >
> >   This document requests IANA to mark the BGP Path Attributes registry
> >   entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID as
> >   "Deprecated".
> >
> >The rest is boilerplate, references, etc.
> >
> >I would like to ask the WG to adopt the draft. Since the draft is so
> >trivial, I would like to also request a WGLC, to run in parallel.
> >
> >Since many WG members will be on holiday for part of next week, let's
> >have the call for adoption + WGLC end on December 3. Please send any
> >comments before December 3.
> >
> >Also, regarding the out-of-the-ordinary expedited WGLC: If there's any
> >disagreement whatsoever (with the content or wording of the draft, its
> >adoption, or indeed the expedited procedure itself), let's have only the
> >call for adoption end on December 3, and then we can do a normal WGLC
> >when appropriate.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >--John (wearing two hats)
> >
> >Begin forwarded message:
> >
> >> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> >> Subject: New Version Notification for
> >>draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
> >> Date: November 14, 2012 1:06:11 PM EST
> >> To: jgs@bgp.nu
> >> Cc: jgs@juniper.net
> >>
> >>
> >> A new version of I-D, draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
> >> has been successfully submitted by John Scudder and posted to the
> >> IETF repository.
> >>
> >> Filename:     draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal
> >> Revision:     00
> >> Title:                Deprecation of BGP Path Attributes DPA,
> ADVERTISER and
> >>RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID
> >> Creation date:        2012-11-14
> >> WG ID:                Individual Submission
> >> Number of pages: 2
> >> URL:
> >>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.t
> >>xt
> >> Status:
> >>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal
> >> Htmlized:
> >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00
> >>
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>   This document requests IANA to deprecate several BGP path attributes,
> >>   associated with an abandoned Internet Draft and a Historic RFC,
> >>   respectively.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The IETF Secretariat
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Idr mailing list
> >Idr@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>