Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt

Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net> Sun, 25 November 2012 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C62D21F8550 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:28:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3+njSmT1zML for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783C221F854E for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (pool-173-72-197-133.clppva.fios.verizon.net [173.72.197.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAP0S8m9032162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:28:10 -0500
References: <20121114180611.17620.93258.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B0B4E04E-A9E6-46DC-B8D5-B183ED44B3D5@juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <B0B4E04E-A9E6-46DC-B8D5-B183ED44B3D5@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4752DF98-DB6E-41DD-9B39-01A5CE209EB9@puck.nether.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523)
From: Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:28:06 -0500
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:28:10 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:28:12 -0000

Support

-Jon

On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:16 PM, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Nobody responded to my note of November 8 ("Deprecating path attributes DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID"). Accordingly, I've submitted the below tiny Internet Draft. The substantive text of the draft is:
> 
> 1.  Introduction
> 
>   As of this writing the BGP Path Attributes registry maintained by
>   IANA contains entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH /
>   CLUSTER_ID.  The first of these is associated with
>   [draft-ietf-idr-bgp-dpa-05], an Internet Draft that was abandoned in
>   1996.  The latter are associated with [RFC1863], an RFC that was
>   reclassified as Historic in 2005.  Neither of these specifications is
>   in use now, nor ever was.
> 
> 
> 2.  IANA Considerations
> 
>   This document requests IANA to mark the BGP Path Attributes registry
>   entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID as
>   "Deprecated".
> 
> The rest is boilerplate, references, etc. 
> 
> I would like to ask the WG to adopt the draft. Since the draft is so trivial, I would like to also request a WGLC, to run in parallel. 
> 
> Since many WG members will be on holiday for part of next week, let's have the call for adoption + WGLC end on December 3. Please send any comments before December 3.
> 
> Also, regarding the out-of-the-ordinary expedited WGLC: If there's any disagreement whatsoever (with the content or wording of the draft, its adoption, or indeed the expedited procedure itself), let's have only the call for adoption end on December 3, and then we can do a normal WGLC when appropriate.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --John (wearing two hats)
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
>> Date: November 14, 2012 1:06:11 PM EST
>> To: jgs@bgp.nu
>> Cc: jgs@juniper.net
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by John Scudder and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Filename:     draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal
>> Revision:     00
>> Title:         Deprecation of BGP Path Attributes DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID
>> Creation date:     2012-11-14
>> WG ID:         Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 2
>> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
>> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal
>> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This document requests IANA to deprecate several BGP path attributes,
>>  associated with an abandoned Internet Draft and a Historic RFC,
>>  respectively.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr