Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt

… and the support text is now longer than the entire draft (- boilerplate ) :-)

Support for both…

W
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Yes/support
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John G. Scudder
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:17 AM
> To: idr@ietf. org
> Subject: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Nobody responded to my note of November 8 ("Deprecating path attributes DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID"). Accordingly, I've submitted the below tiny Internet Draft. The substantive text of the draft is:
> 
> 1.  Introduction
> 
>   As of this writing the BGP Path Attributes registry maintained by
>   IANA contains entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH /
>   CLUSTER_ID.  The first of these is associated with
>   [draft-ietf-idr-bgp-dpa-05], an Internet Draft that was abandoned in
>   1996.  The latter are associated with [RFC1863], an RFC that was
>   reclassified as Historic in 2005.  Neither of these specifications is
>   in use now, nor ever was.
> 
> 
> 2.  IANA Considerations
> 
>   This document requests IANA to mark the BGP Path Attributes registry
>   entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID as
>   "Deprecated".
> 
> The rest is boilerplate, references, etc. 
> 
> I would like to ask the WG to adopt the draft. Since the draft is so trivial, I would like to also request a WGLC, to run in parallel. 
> 
> Since many WG members will be on holiday for part of next week, let's have the call for adoption + WGLC end on December 3. Please send any comments before December 3.
> 
> Also, regarding the out-of-the-ordinary expedited WGLC: If there's any disagreement whatsoever (with the content or wording of the draft, its adoption, or indeed the expedited procedure itself), let's have only the call for adoption end on December 3, and then we can do a normal WGLC when appropriate.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --John (wearing two hats)
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> Subject: New Version Notification for 
>> draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
>> Date: November 14, 2012 1:06:11 PM EST
>> To: jgs@bgp.nu
>> Cc: jgs@juniper.net
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by John Scudder and posted to the IETF 
>> repository.
>> 
>> Filename:	 draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal
>> Revision:	 00
>> Title:		 Deprecation of BGP Path Attributes DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID
>> Creation date:	 2012-11-14
>> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 2
>> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
>> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal
>> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This document requests IANA to deprecate several BGP path attributes,
>>  associated with an abandoned Internet Draft and a Historic RFC,
>>  respectively.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 

-- 
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest." 
    -- Anonymous