Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Wed, 28 November 2012 17:49 UTC
Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDC721F889E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:49:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VmT+W7aApyS for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.friendswithtools.org (unknown [64.78.239.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7AA21F888E for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dspam (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.friendswithtools.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AAD822D6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:49:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dul1dmcphers-m2.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (nat1.corp-fo.iad1.verisign.com [216.168.230.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.friendswithtools.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34EA22206; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:49:56 -0700 (MST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <B0B4E04E-A9E6-46DC-B8D5-B183ED44B3D5@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:49:55 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D3770042-5215-4E8D-8999-7894042D2431@tcb.net>
References: <20121114180611.17620.93258.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B0B4E04E-A9E6-46DC-B8D5-B183ED44B3D5@juniper.net>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Nov 28 10:49:56 2012
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023
X-DSPAM-Signature: 50b64ec4199634325019771
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, of+#+#+Deprecating, 0.40000, Subject*Idr+#+WG, 0.40000, use+#+so, 0.40000, to+#+point, 0.40000, CLUSTER+#+#+#+submitted, 0.40000, a+#+where, 0.40000, If+#+ever, 0.40000, as+#+If, 0.40000, tiny+#+#+#+substantive, 0.40000, to+#+the, 0.40000, to+#+the, 0.40000, as+#+Might, 0.40000, ADVERTISER+#+RCID, 0.40000, ADVERTISER+#+RCID, 0.40000, CLUSTER+#+#+#+as, 0.40000, remove+#+ambiguities, 0.40000, I+#+#+#+changes, 0.40000, To*Scudder+jgs, 0.40000, ambiguities+#+IANA, 0.40000, Deprecated+The, 0.40000, ambiguities+#+#+Considerations, 0.40000, IESG+#+#+#+changing, 0.40000, changing+#+#+values, 0.40000, Might+#+#+this, 0.40000, as+Deprecated, 0.40000, as+Deprecated, 0.40000, points+the, 0.40000
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-scudder-deprecate-dpa-etal-00.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:49:57 -0000
On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:16 PM, John G. Scudder wrote: > Hi, > > Nobody responded to my note of November 8 ("Deprecating path attributes DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID"). Accordingly, I've submitted the below tiny Internet Draft. The substantive text of the draft is: ... > 2. IANA Considerations > > This document requests IANA to mark the BGP Path Attributes registry > entries for DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID as > "Deprecated". > > The rest is boilerplate, references, etc. John, I support this as well. Might I offer this trivial changes to remove potential ambiguities: ===== 2. IANA Considerations This document requests IANA to mark the BGP Path Attributes registry entries for DPA (Value 11), ADVERTISER (Value 12), and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID (Value 13) as "Deprecated". ===== If we ever get to a point where there is a lack of code points, the IESG would then confirm changing the deprecated values to be unassigned for use, or so it goes.. -danny
- [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draft-sc… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Keyur Patel (keyupate)
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Jie Dong
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Chandra Appanna
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat)
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Jon Mitchell
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… Danny McPherson
- Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption and WGLC of draf… David Farmer