Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

Di Ma <madi@rpstir.net> Mon, 28 October 2019 05:07 UTC

Return-Path: <madi@rpstir.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A671200F8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 22:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2JAYTA0WKzD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 22:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out20-110.mail.aliyun.com (out20-110.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.20.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A48C5120013 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 22:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE; BC=0.2914142|-1; CH=green; DM=CONTINUE|CONTINUE|true|0.0753491-0.0025779-0.922073; FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01a16378; MF=madi@rpstir.net; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=2; RT=2; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---.FrJOnkJ_1572239221;
Received: from 192.168.218.230(mailfrom:madi@rpstir.net fp:SMTPD_---.FrJOnkJ_1572239221) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(10.147.41.137); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:07:02 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Di Ma <madi@rpstir.net>
In-Reply-To: <015d01d582c4$388e04d0$a9aa0e70$@ndzh.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:06:55 +0800
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <005E847E-75A8-452E-A6BC-29482C33C620@rpstir.net>
References: <015d01d582c4$388e04d0$a9aa0e70$@ndzh.com>
To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TiWE4tleAvaAnWDwkVna9o-j8N0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 05:07:17 -0000

 
As far as I understand this document, it specifies an extension to the BGP protocol to offer better traffic engineering.

By introducing a new SAFI and wide community to distribute policies, the very mechanism could be implemented and controlled in a given bailiwick.

I am in support of this draft adopted as a WG item.

Di

> 在 2019年10月15日,03:18,Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> 写道:
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt
> (10/14 to 10/28/2019).  You can access the draft at: 
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/
>  
> In your discussion regarding this draft consider if:
>  
> 1)      Passing extended policy in BGP  is useful,
> 2)      Passing policy in wide community atom is a technical sound mechanism,
> 3)      A deployment need exists for this technology.
>  
>  
> Susan Hares
> Co-chair and shepherd 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr