Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

Huaimo Chen <hchen@futurewei.com> Fri, 01 November 2019 02:44 UTC

Return-Path: <hchen@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FEC12006D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 19:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=0.1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oSzgVGXAANd0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 19:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr680137.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.68.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BBDA120091 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 19:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MWybvaUqQu2LPAkBsUMGusBsES3bS5rHtKSBqSZUSPy6GFNnAVYMWdM55J0Ofhz/2PnUK10v8LYXzxR4mcKCVBgKOHDCf+5i3g4rirpV2+HYtjMd48EqIeJHWFtswigE18AEj2X1RFpVMCrEjrFAzNFz10iowbh78xulxy2LZ1iOZkR0D/hCAoNBR6hki2M5pz+4XhoqjcBc0898Y7XSco0RP5WA99aqVFV5VHatDUTKvbHq/Pa4VtQ7B+X8ozocgNA+FIVYeRWZ1c8V83u2ayjrDJtF9mwrnfWK1Tmw+Hp6usBZZrb8ilT7aWcXGMtyzyOT/ImjOKVxEG4xUshD0Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vd8oFG3mlCd0a5IphZpJ06Ysn01SxMpxKQGkkONpRJg=; b=j/46aVLZXkFcYiYZrowa8suO7tyCXEcD1q4trn2TepU0YF9Lks2cFxW9jOZTDXoA43e63OfnVl5HN+LOn7sBAa5e1SE0F2HVC53IyLYmgy5WSswOA2CRgr2YUIePD8LS45cI7FT+0pc7UX9ZBpesM44bOoilqeWbVMb0+mL/R9nhxOWMXeEpgjDmUBucqRmXNqA1Pu3Fg8vx3AcEUKXQYFfAv7G/I/XSfRjIl7KXHWT9nwFE3+tR8afK0X2Jz45AE/TDce+fZ/V720cxaEfp3rKPLhzD8W1ovPlg4N+wRy5FlbacyP6EyPF6+2ylJXDHaxAL+NDBGEPJj0eahxH3QQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vd8oFG3mlCd0a5IphZpJ06Ysn01SxMpxKQGkkONpRJg=; b=XbuUe/pq21g82kyfdUYYvMSJrgIYajtKwqjUPTrfGEneNYM/WtIFgG0qBOW7QP9TH3ZWP4f29363UlpDkpI/rKwGhtj4QKCAaBwvPdFivE80YOSl5OY84P8/M/PYe+HxEM/2iO97Bq4qVmNpZ+3UjMcpQl359uhuslk9Ce4rmGQ=
Received: from MWHPR13MB1805.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.171.146.11) by MWHPR13MB1437.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.175.140.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2408.15; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 02:44:01 +0000
Received: from MWHPR13MB1805.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e1f0:92f3:6f71:6e97]) by MWHPR13MB1805.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e1f0:92f3:6f71:6e97%12]) with mapi id 15.20.2408.016; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 02:44:01 +0000
From: Huaimo Chen <hchen@futurewei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'Christoph Loibl' <c@tix.at>
CC: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)
Thread-Index: AdWCvtFpBLL09mJXRVKaSdG0p0gs7gMkxngAACamqwAAG+lbUQ==
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 02:44:01 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR13MB1805081D607911F8F368F5BCA3620@MWHPR13MB1805.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <015d01d582c4$388e04d0$a9aa0e70$@ndzh.com> <A3C0954F-7804-4121-8D0B-9DC497ED6EA9@tix.at>, <008e01d58fec$870715e0$951541a0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <008e01d58fec$870715e0$951541a0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=hchen@futurewei.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:199:4300:8e5a:11fd:c118:29e3:c9dd]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8e6b32e2-eee3-4a0c-3dba-08d75e755a2d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR13MB1437:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR13MB14376C6217C359368F0DA0A4A3620@MWHPR13MB1437.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 020877E0CB
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(4636009)(366004)(376002)(136003)(39850400004)(396003)(346002)(55674003)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(486006)(478600001)(81166006)(229853002)(11346002)(446003)(46003)(45080400002)(8676002)(86362001)(105004)(476003)(19627405001)(81156014)(64756008)(33656002)(66446008)(8936002)(52536014)(6436002)(966005)(2906002)(606006)(6116002)(110136005)(76116006)(5660300002)(66946007)(66556008)(99286004)(66476007)(71190400001)(55016002)(102836004)(236005)(14454004)(76176011)(25786009)(7736002)(6306002)(54896002)(4326008)(7696005)(6506007)(9686003)(53546011)(256004)(316002)(14444005)(6246003)(71200400001)(74316002)(186003)(781001)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR13MB1437; H:MWHPR13MB1805.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: futurewei.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ZCWMHWL94hYs79sQjAdsirnXEcigtNuVskmcVAtprc4wig7v5n0qncjaQXN3iaPJXKTGX8347jee5SjfQYu84KSZ1poGtTEPC9z/xb4ICfwc2/A0d3Ka7JuJgXhbKcSesN5o8Mys1Rn98I7UGOZFcecFFFNBKMoxih6eQrMti70q0mG9ljtCgDpM9lI0m/v5Hu6kipNK5iyYETCv2NfnSm0GFYqk8pLZffX1C7YmOsLorAX19tsyVoAHOafTKMjajNAA84LoERuDH73NOgp++JhscenEqwajFXFmN3qYUXBR38mrD38LyX8T0e4odf116EkeR58kJ6BJXTmEfkL8us6ws0+qFy4ReRB0kmceTBcxQ+kVHl557M+kHEXs6eRa4MYVyeycdYW0f/fway1clDj6kmw1JAy8v8sbpO42TqjKfZOEZUv5RULg6tRHFQR8qRwbNdeKAjCEladvznobqXiwrMLPFSFIB3HTUC7yL8U=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MWHPR13MB1805081D607911F8F368F5BCA3620MWHPR13MB1805namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8e6b32e2-eee3-4a0c-3dba-08d75e755a2d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Nov 2019 02:44:01.1314 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: b3Ac/GF9BxiOcgbPPNYRycvRaWCWpAACIl/TQJH6fRtx3aPsQ3Bk8tnRcx8dW78Nn6G93sZkOgs90Fw/zqfnXQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR13MB1437
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/tS4QSpu24bhA8O2a-1qw3EM-BSk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:44:07 -0000

Hi Christoph,

    Thanks much for your support and suggesting tilte draft-ietf-idr-bgp-rpd for the draft.
   This title is good. Would it be better to use draft-ietf-idr-bgp-routing-policy-distribution?
    The latter is similar to other titles such as draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-policy-path-segment.

Best Regards,
Huaimo
________________________________
From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 9:10 AM
To: 'Christoph Loibl' <c@tix.at>
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

Christoph:
<WG member hat on, individual contributor>
I agree with your review of the title.

Sue Hares

-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Loibl [mailto:c@tix.at]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:43 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: idr wg
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call
(10/14 to 10/28/2019)

I know, I am very late with my support. I was unable to read the latest
version of the document till now.

I fully support the adoption (this happened already I know).

However, one thing I want to mention:

The technology described in the document is not really related to BGP
Flowspec and even the title has been changed in the meantime:

        from
        BGP FlowSpec Extensions for Routing Policy Distribution (RPD) (-00)
        to
        BGP Extensions for Routing Policy Distribution (RPD) (-05)

I recommend using a different working-title for the draft as well (currently
draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd / draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-rpd) to avoid confusion
with other flowspec related work in IDR (ie. draft-ietf-idr-bgp-rpd-00)

Cheers Christoph

--
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nextlayer.at&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Cf87644e2b368483fc73e08d75e03ccf9%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637081242736400279&amp;sdata=B3%2FWszat01yiMTQLuulRBqcKrs6izPnWrqxYX0ge%2BG8%3D&amp;reserved=0



> On 14.10.2019, at 21:18, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt

> (10/14 to 10/28/2019).  You can access the draft at:
>
> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Cf87644e2b368483fc73e08d75e03ccf9%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637081242736400279&amp;sdata=oN2YF8xB0VNV%2BYkbqEcZVURE3M4RFDTn5pIwRIfnU3Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> In your discussion regarding this draft consider if:
>
> 1)      Passing extended policy in BGP  is useful,
> 2)      Passing policy in wide community atom is a technical sound
mechanism,
> 3)      A deployment need exists for this technology.
>
>
> Susan Hares
> Co-chair and shepherd
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fidr&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Cf87644e2b368483fc73e08d75e03ccf9%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637081242736400279&amp;sdata=7UJGGV31hhkTUieQuXjy0gFd3yyOJ9SuWyuT4ued8Ag%3D&amp;reserved=0


_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fidr&amp;data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Cf87644e2b368483fc73e08d75e03ccf9%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637081242736400279&amp;sdata=7UJGGV31hhkTUieQuXjy0gFd3yyOJ9SuWyuT4ued8Ag%3D&amp;reserved=0