Re: [Idr] draft-chen-bgp-redist-01.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 20 August 2021 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953553A1FA9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnBnvyWpME4S for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6243A1F6C for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 560131E280; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:40:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:40:33 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Cc: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210820184032.GA19054@pfrc.org>
References: <CANJ8pZ9Und3fF324tzTAkhrMFV0MZfhHYfZussiYSCNUx-n_Hw@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3BXk=+fuxVSg_9j+u+5Ffr+NQGE9P75NCPpTaUr5LqYQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMFxM_yvrPDEyQ+dpO7ZxoiQKa0DE4ZQf763Cuidj76QXg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV1q-H1pSypWCvA9VKXBZZTfM3nQNPktjbmbN0D=VSXpBw@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV29-t-N6EMmJQzOairgTB5jsPX1h6Q0e+akEgiA2cUpQg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV1QAR8qHdP+rSTOk3eRU5A5tMAfWFFyqXYPQteHtoNyBg@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR11MB3207B8AE524F71ED25590B94C01F9@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <AM7PR07MB6248B0D69C861D1898EBE921A01F9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR11MB3207B35CA69BD68E144D1878C01F9@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <AM7PR07MB62480E63A1509DD054529C05A01C9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB62480E63A1509DD054529C05A01C9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/VoZmOZzQ4h5sMPd49NSyvY-fmTc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-chen-bgp-redist-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:40:40 -0000

Tom,

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 04:24:55PM +0000, tom petch wrote:
> From: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz@cisco.com>
> Sent: 02 July 2021 21:25
> 
> Thanks Tom. You complete my search.
> 
> <tp>
> Almost.  It also appears in 
> bgp-model
> as adopted by this WG and so is closer to home, but then the I-D is expired which is how come I forgot it!

The IETF BGP yang model originated from the OpenConfig model where they
chose this as the general purpose terminology.

Coming from Juniper-land where this is "preference", it's still good enough
and represents an appropriate abstraction.  (Although this thread is making
me wonder if we really do agree on this...)

-- Jeff