Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-06.txt (2/4/2022 to 2/18/2022)

Job: 

<WG Chair> 
Thank you for letting me know there are broken links
 on the implementation page.  I believe I have addressed these issues.  
Please reload your page and let me know if there are more. 

I hope you will provide feedback on atoms 1-8 
as optional  features that are not implemented. 

In the past, the IDR has made the following choices on
1) remove from specification (knowing may come back as a BIS)
2) hold the draft for implementations of atoms 1-8. 
3) keep optional features in the text, but note lack of 
    implementations  (rare, but possible if WG desires). 
<WG chair off> 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Job Snijders
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 10:41 AM
To: Robert Raszuk
Cc: Keyur Patel; idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-06.txt
(2/4/2022 to 2/18/2022)

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 04:27:53PM +0100, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Hi Job,
> 
> The URL Keyur sent is correct and points to correct document:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities/
> 
> The implementation wiki indeed has some broken links to draft-idr-rpd ...
> maybe copy and paste error ? Not sure. Maybe someone needs to do some 
> cleanup on it ?

Again, I am referring to the content on
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities
- a URL that Keyur provided.

trac != datatracker

Kind regards,

Job

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr