IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-06.txt (2/4/2022 to 2/18/2022)

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Tue, 08 February 2022 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <job@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA833A09E9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 04:35:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qHOlx4ZUv12j for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 04:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D683A09EF for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 04:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id a8so51809657ejc.8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 04:35:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pZh62O2r7cvXYhM7SYhXxi2YoIwbyznV08BpNhSe5H8=; b=VAXFekmnJMHQaXMeAeRNOSRgRNCooufWltQ0hf/x9GsuA7Vm4y+Oa+4KVLZlEq+OUZ LE9dXSERFg2qZHDU73dqWlMVtDi2SYZklskjp4t4YvMbzP+O8ER8O1UZTffFrzCDctas Rgha1uE9G8S+LNaQPq151h8/s+SGzmyn8GIdU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pZh62O2r7cvXYhM7SYhXxi2YoIwbyznV08BpNhSe5H8=; b=k9z6cMsyORVVwZb8Qp0qMC56WI1QkhwnCD6Z4RLpAxa2zTZ5UXjRW+DDO8Z+MNJlO/ Oi70OuIIyZzjE5yBr0DxLEu0zedrebZNkoI/YM+PyA1xRvOGW/OAnvad0VSnAFLhpLtt BD0QkB2CHkg+XDaf4FoPp9k6Z1yMMv1DjjBt8wQvqlK/YeP/cqrrYAzaN3UiEzhOLF67 tQ1SM/6I/lo4dPaGubusoBclCpA3HKOMr4vsoDeL4AKjilJxxb4Dl+I+jqcUkj4lRt+M mjvo0uoNJKIA2wXLvyQUWoHFB5vWRcsv4w5OQcp33N/ZcImDavPVCArKJPUQgBPFztJe Hc2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Ptdal7wZ2SL+B51fQJVoM3pAP6dF2J3BTjF1yipNey/DLwHvr SkS8+mTj0tvUWVZHFoCxO4KE+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziaFYkABgqUm4bsipVqABeVW4nYOw/OYzkZ+AWxIqYspeiJ8VYx14H3t0wSG6iaoWPuAbFsw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:60d5:: with SMTP id f21mr3580354ejk.482.1644323736741; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 04:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from snel ([2a10:3781:276:2:16f6:d8ff:fe47:2eb7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18sm4755470ejb.106.2022.02.08.04.35.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 04:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:35:34 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YgJjllbTtHbeuNAT@snel>
References: <YgEsgptvEKG5pxHJ@snel> <CAOj+MMHc0upTKYKe48aaMtNt24OGZt9YSx1U2zkoG5FYc=k9Bg@mail.gmail.com> <YgE2tc8kSzAFEc1P@snel> <CAOj+MMHfHgf1w0SGdX3+KLARWj4pYQEfEfpcy1wSm30PA3PULw@mail.gmail.com> <YgE9i1DuUkAfrKjh@snel> <00e901d81c40$0c9ba040$25d2e0c0$@ndzh.com> <YgFL42Cevf8Q4im7@snel> <CAOj+MMFHYCS8wfSJMpgn33nU12gidGODmujHgf57w5jtzfgjSw@mail.gmail.com> <007701d81c7c$3bce5510$b36aff30$@ndzh.com> <CAOj+MMERaXakiQBx-LQf-p6pB_PPR7RXs+g6LOmXDnkxcTsV_A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMERaXakiQBx-LQf-p6pB_PPR7RXs+g6LOmXDnkxcTsV_A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nMQfE8an9v5Qg5L-P99phm-6_v8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-06.txt (2/4/2022 to 2/18/2022)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 12:35:45 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:50:47AM +0100, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> The only question which I think Job brings to the table is if currently
> defined atoms in the WGLC draft could stay or should be removed.
> 
> My personal recommendation is to keep them in the spec. Reason being that
> authors went via extensive discussions with community which lead to define
> and document those atoms. Keeping them in the document also for one allows
> any implementation to catch up while does not close the door (as proven) to
> define new atoms.

Interesting! From my recollection of discussions with the community
there is low appetite for those atoms.

I fear IDR would do itself a disservice if the WG publishes documents
which (in part) never have been implemented. I forsee that challenges
could arise down the road due to perceived ambiguities, not so
dissimilar from issues with the original FlowSpec specification.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email