IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (11/12 to 11/26)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 21 November 2017 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F37A126B6E; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:55:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBTgcVZ9tKDq; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:55:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com (mail-wr0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AED21241F5; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:55:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u40so12775507wrf.10; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:55:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=FQk5iiu/itcWuaHprzKPZP9TrzG3lV6sDtIYwfGjrU4=; b=NoT+v0P5cWAQt7xPas6zCRMYqmyIpG2Yf7MHGLw9I2fR2zEiLjwF7uPoz3uz1UfkOh EtaT/OeX0Wpi0yOyXL9aIKjgYK+MI/NKjBqxMl9kSw0px2BA7EMFeVi0dYXRhSzKy1Si O4Eu6SpI4jbGINQE0pFvEYQGEedAPtZka8runI8x6Uv2dnvcEBir/hwWddPS8XLniMvH t0FU6KnFBxnE6QW7emfoB/MHu0HL73dxe+p8+bvbXrSWZbufB/DftLBxkXMq82Af1duZ mqK8IuhSXB3wH5eY71y6J8wCfvi6b/E6rDtuiMGV1r3C9g44R95xj9o/lEHtkz7K1QNB dPOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FQk5iiu/itcWuaHprzKPZP9TrzG3lV6sDtIYwfGjrU4=; b=UOHdJxTpBq5p7aUIM7sXO2Z9QNzUtoC59dWQAJ6O5k80lZlJK83Zl5OGkVT8D4RoV9 ID5ZTMeDqVNX2D3BHwe3l78/KLXCgd6rQ8qIx3UydJ49PautvcrSOwbTGSM1wg2TAO9t Z8SUMbHvAF7sH5R5d7cgVbge6yhn9OGMNNwGTHoJ/LmHeUSPXt+GgpwNqnpl3xZklv0S CZeEZ3N/QWjFpMYNtPawU3/DuolHT+yRS5/7rCZdQdOt0pts0C+f4hviqBwHmgMAjuxL hXkxJXOKCU5bK1de0yIkK/UbHe6TYe6ewoPKbnS5C9HMbxTh28YP2Snl+cpLR/Rkl1eT /XJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7VqaZ4fx7x9ESZfzDBfs0Iy5RvKp1SNke5ugRd1XDGd08eneQU HHF7TZQ4GrobnjOJSVnwV27E/HS6Niyhw2fKdm8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbGi9cIEC8nsjdUb8d8GkfuLPD6SzAt9ZcroZQniOs/y/o+46T/Jxpowb9+o5dUvrjjtMXXPDmX4teQT6b1H30=
X-Received: by 10.223.131.129 with SMTP id 1mr15420710wre.205.1511304898572; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:54:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.54.217 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:54:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <976743ea96934039a85fa74415b45862@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
References: <000901d35c08$3f12d950$bd388bf0$@ndzh.com> <B61C3B8F-1168-4EB1-8D8E-88C4BF28B3AA@exa.net.uk> <CA+b+ER=1sHhAqhOc2VipzZMB+Zsxk8n+8cNUshkjPw_A9k9E-A@mail.gmail.com> <39049A8C-6D47-4251-AF87-342F68DDE8AE@exa.net.uk> <CA+b+ER=ANs15BEmRKeqneVHNcTSCsGDMVDQgFV4OucwPSWcLgw@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC9Yde99EbhLrveCtoUVSZWiP=sL=k69zrGBeNj5AjCGFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk_2XZ_Y3EqSjNAbSi1ZqKhD2oThrRR2EOJzckQ41GijA@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC-EfzOYdUrHAWQN10LBzofySrKRADc6Zq-dyca1o0DPvw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=ppm1N2wnMrPxxS_Nug2EaETBkW5gASTVZ2UKKq0aZJA@mail.gmail.com> <976743ea96934039a85fa74415b45862@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 23:54:57 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FPTYVvLZXB_34NUFQlonbtELmFs
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmpEghcndHKM+WKKxg1V8ufTwg=xqb0J5jNowZHj2OwAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-ads@ietf.org" <idr-ads@ietf.org>, Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org>, Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa.net.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d2326a077d9055e8617e0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/dC-nbCPsTasWf4-U3QtXda3tHxo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (11/12 to 11/26)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:55:02 -0000

Hi Jakob,

I think what you added is fine, but requires a time limit.

Statement that implementation can receive, parse/validate, display in CLI
or match in the policy 16K of communities all actions taking 1h each is
rather not that interesting isn't it ?

Or is the indicator of spec compliance a statement that it just does not
crash regardless of time it takes for execution of each stated action :) ?

Thx,
//R.





On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz@cisco.com>
wrote:

> The new update message size requires support for:
>
> 16375 communities
>
> 8187 extended communities
>
> 5458 large communities
>
> I have not changed the as-path length, because it is already ridiculously
> high.
>
> If anyone wants to talk about a maximum as-path length, please speak up.
>
>
>
> I have added tests to the implementation report
>
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-
> extended-implementations
>
> to ensure full compliance with the consequences of the draft.
>
>
>
> Implementers, please update your compliance.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jakob
>
>
>
> *From:* Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert Raszuk
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:41 AM
> *To:* Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
> *Cc:* idr wg <idr@ietf.org>; idr-ads@ietf.org; Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org>;
> Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa.net.uk>
> *Subject:* Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages
> (11/12 to 11/26)
>
>
>
> Great !
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
>
> Robert/Randy,
>
>
>
> About this being a default:
>
>
>
> Old (Section 4):
>
>
>
> A BGP speaker that is willing to send and receive BGP Extended Messages
> with a peer SHOULD advertise the BGP Extended Message Capability to the
> peer using BGP Capabilities Advertisement RFC5492].
>
>
>
> New (Section 4)
>
>
>
> A BGP speaker that is capable to send and receive BGP Extended Messages
> with a peer SHOULD advertise the BGP Extended Message Capability to the
> peer using BGP Capabilities Advertisement [RFC5492].
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email