IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (11/12 to 11/26)

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Tue, 21 November 2017 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D18B124D6C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:21:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WCNlmjjGbfax for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:3::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9828129AD4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1eHBIj-0002Ml-Sq (job@us.ntt.net) for idr@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:21:36 +0000
Received: by mail-ot0-f170.google.com with SMTP id s4so11000298ote.4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:21:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX69Q2xjcSLzQDnNiapxOBpth2RPZAgIRcllOo+qZNkaad4tvgC7 AtcqQhd9Qn4sPVNGOzRskIB1u7YnxVExbyohtOe0nw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbH6xWoxXjmtmz6k5BjLQgkY5BCYp+YiNsM1Ah0tt2A2qQh/8+99Chpl8cgeKEr8kk/sfMC/VcJXB/y13hYGiA=
X-Received: by 10.157.68.209 with SMTP id p17mr11569228otg.66.1511281292983; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:21:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <000901d35c08$3f12d950$bd388bf0$@ndzh.com> <B61C3B8F-1168-4EB1-8D8E-88C4BF28B3AA@exa.net.uk> <CA+b+ER=1sHhAqhOc2VipzZMB+Zsxk8n+8cNUshkjPw_A9k9E-A@mail.gmail.com> <39049A8C-6D47-4251-AF87-342F68DDE8AE@exa.net.uk> <CA+b+ER=ANs15BEmRKeqneVHNcTSCsGDMVDQgFV4OucwPSWcLgw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=ANs15BEmRKeqneVHNcTSCsGDMVDQgFV4OucwPSWcLgw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:21:22 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACWOCC9Yde99EbhLrveCtoUVSZWiP=sL=k69zrGBeNj5AjCGFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACWOCC9Yde99EbhLrveCtoUVSZWiP=sL=k69zrGBeNj5AjCGFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org>, Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa.net.uk>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, idr-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043c42049fd79c055e809877"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nj6WcOmTArTuhfox4N9n0PJQngo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (11/12 to 11/26)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:21:40 -0000

On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 at 15:03, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

>
> My take would be to make it enabled by default (potentially with a knob to
> disable it if needed) .. otherwise we are creating even worse swiss cheese
> even among those implementations which do support it.
>

+ 1 to this.

I’m working on another open source implementation that will have this
enabled by default as well.

Seems sensible if all vendors would take that approach.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email