Re: [Idr] RFC 4684 pedantry - routes with no Route Target

[Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]>]

Assume I do have a valid SR application to filter tiny subset of
Internet table. For this I can mark such tiny subset of routes with
RTs, enable RTC and activate RT filtering on IPv4 session.

Sending full table there where I need only few routes would kill the
optimization completely.

Btw .. how do you handle the same problem with ORF ?

r.

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> While a complicating factor certainly, we'd still end up sending along those
>> routes after either end-of-rib for RT-C or the timeout.  (Presuming the
>> implementation follows the SHOULD.)
>
> After timeout yes, but not after valid set of RTC RT NLRIs followed by
> EOR. .. I would not expect to see those in the latter case.
>
> r.
>
>> So, while it causes potential delay to the subset of the routes carrying no
>> RT, presumably they're in the same family because some of the routes will
>> have an RT and want to benefit from the feature.
>>
>> -- Jeff