Re: [Idr] RFC 4684 pedantry - routes with no Route Target

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 21 May 2014 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034361A045E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iq3W41fYY_SM for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126491A0346 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id as1so2268231iec.27 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CZ2nahE+DKrojaANc5Jo/7IVUgLv32TMXERbSBrkm60=; b=v4+eeJ9JgdFY1WupLLu6mXtO8iFNQZW5DGoihUZT45cpMhG/OlrwU+SFeTnENRTPPu sd1mgGTniEN1qCGbyp4zhNnNc0PxOYkuiyA3gsxNVpQWBCHKvSfMC/AeenxPmq3u05ka KHycllch0qiFOfq8HdLp0AfMtBRPt5q8TakwexWaYwiGvRWBXwqyoLH8RQzK277voVhK 60gyii02OALKcNXp8zIVbGGTQHgJtdhM6kUVjopgjeZpWi2zNKKyqHcXT9Qavb1E99qU iUXzH9JdzszfWHcqe+4ofFs3FfKKE8VvEueh+cJ5VAi+rx5GU++h8TP1SBnfBNeAQmYM urIg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.13.67 with SMTP id f3mr15304322igc.9.1400690453922; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.242.198 with HTTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140521163742.GG9789@pfrc>
References: <20140521124753.GC5675@pfrc> <8540.1400685704@erosen-lnx> <CA+b+ERnwBqV8zgeSju_KiMEw_mnfOca8ZSiAuzMZt_U=Dd-r+g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=Hx7qe_1QAsa_cpX_JEqPOc7bToDGTyFz+-XTP1iju4A@mail.gmail.com> <20140521163742.GG9789@pfrc>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:40:53 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Az6fwyROQobktOggPT4wduOm24Q
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERk7tb7x_z=biX9R8fXLN7YXGja+QW625Z0k6zNceGFkhg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/jH3W4okvGcJkYFrKguvMHcpl37I
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "erosen@cisco.com" <erosen@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] RFC 4684 pedantry - routes with no Route Target
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:40:56 -0000

It all depends how you implement your filters :)

r.



On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:33:24PM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>> In the situations where protocol SAFI contains a mix (tagged and not
>> tagged NLRIs with RTs) I would rather propose to amend the rfc to
>> exchange default RT + specific RTs. That would potentially allow for
>> reception of NLRIs with no RT attached + filtering of those against
>> more specific RTs received which do carry RT ext community.
>
> Default RT-C effectively negates the usefulness of the feature.  I wouldn't
> recommend this.
>
> -- Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr