IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Mon, 16 November 2020 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5C73A1153 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 00:20:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=iOjVOyfZ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=htHJ0G7j
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dDMYTDdAurLS for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 00:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A543A09C6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 00:20:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13631; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1605514829; x=1606724429; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=uUuMidnS3ncAwxn85yuqk5YWCoA0tSqAvNn9Kh+4ziw=; b=iOjVOyfZAd3zWeTE5K3w/BjWSDPDqmXJSW7zFCWhxxprWwHsKluXWQ3+ /FT4E/2JjaAjvTlXHbeaCvWdCIQSG5jO18KWWulNjzUBPAqJ+HmA7Q4nv +qJQLXULK8yAz0C4CWkg6AoRsGpbeTMTxzRzyPm2h1GvHZerYQnrJ49Qj Y=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0DKAQDxM7JffYQNJK1iHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBgX4FAQsBgSIvUXtZLy4KhDKDSQONV4EFkw+Eb4FCgREDVAsBAQENAQEjCgIEAQGESgIXggcCJTcGDgIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEFAEBhjwMhXIBAQEBAxILBh0BATcBDwIBCA4DAwECJAcCAgIwHQgBAQQBDQUigwQBgX5XAy4BAgyhKQKBPIhodoEygwQBAQWBR0GCehiCEAMGgTgBgnKDdoZXG4FBP4ERJxyCGgcuPoEEgVkCAwGBIVoNgmozgiyTaIcejA6RHgqCbYkPkgYDH4MZihaUSodci3aKfZVWAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFqIoFZcBVlAYI+UBcCDY4fGB+DOoUUhUR0NwIGAQkBAQMJfIw7AYEQAQE
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:+hKukBzNzxpxeFLXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWFt/Nhnl+PVoLeuLpIiOvT5qbnX2FIoZOMq2sLf5EEURgZwd4XkAotDI/gawX7IffmYjZ8EJFEU1lorHe3I0gTE8H7NBXep3So5msUHRPyfQN+OuXyHNvUiMK6n+C/8pHeeUNGnj24NLhzNx6x6w7Ws5ob
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,482,1596499200"; d="scan'208,217";a="590806877"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 16 Nov 2020 08:20:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0AG8KSlJ008021 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:20:28 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 02:20:28 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 02:20:28 -0600
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 03:20:28 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=XIu8BKW/aFu+G79ZVhkDKR590N1vcglMUDggT0Cxmco6NJoeYCRUWcTOhJiVCMoJ4caO9+FT9FPPMHXD+ayjB4fz05PqLQrRgeiwA8gzMMF3DrV0lNS2DBO86KoiL4nz/a/qZ5MBC6zazRV1F31mhehTDD0sxsjDphAqxf2izhrWnSWZyU/jwMZwMaZ/9zYH7SI1019J6mlBOMYE/dQo7gQLHHxsk7TWJHDecdoqfk4/UaSEao+/jqB0fUZi60HM8pu97vXIoHM8wwqZ6LnDz9JDt0R/zCC6rHAO/ny8XWvoIduy0bVRqv1Pl75l87k/d+erS1bZvuYsOb2XanpRrg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uUuMidnS3ncAwxn85yuqk5YWCoA0tSqAvNn9Kh+4ziw=; b=cRBLDVwmlT+wHgjZLEdrI9LM/7T8R7nMNgDhlLwFDYmzmtx2zvG0EoN0nLfuZQIr74Ou475OPbcA0Q/Oyfd3DdhQBf/AiFUeRmN9EZYnj2Gly2O2ia4OQMCiCnwBF941Sze02tyCu+VqP35ZE17x1gY8iWDAtUzKwa9sdsv9KrgbaWRLXSmqOUjjw+m5XuI4nV6dgAnpimvkpNYuG6JtTz0mNdDIPQNQWyElxfriGK4EglDya9jdvF/8feg5Qa/oFAmGAP8OW7z/YQoeqYb9Tjyz79u7GWkcjTDbZcpvi4eVQxkIZRS4HneYr2cFAfsG2CL0keEgszV/5f830hxKUg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uUuMidnS3ncAwxn85yuqk5YWCoA0tSqAvNn9Kh+4ziw=; b=htHJ0G7jvCSTxdTJrT681/e+qJY7HLZVRqQCMN1c9cs24EdCXBLXQRzwT9jWzgRWDlXBdNvInQ+2iEY17WyvIZMWXXN7jwkfFgoOBVaeBuyJwHiA2t1knNncKjoQJPkA8WWvxz4WaHbvrPo0i2SNRtYC1QOJ11ZUvDS4sZ4/qe4=
Received: from DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:2aa::11) by DM5PR11MB0027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:6b::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3564.25; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:20:27 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::31bb:ee91:659c:993a]) by DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::31bb:ee91:659c:993a%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3564.028; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:20:27 +0000
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
Thread-Index: Adaw2PtgBctpKEXkRb++HOEf6MFzKAK7nFKA
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:20:26 +0000
Message-ID: <2F4E6BB2-F743-454B-99EC-D8AD1185758A@cisco.com>
References: <055301d6b0dc$f84da4a0$e8e8ede0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <055301d6b0dc$f84da4a0$e8e8ede0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.43.20110804
authentication-results: ndzh.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ndzh.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [47.185.231.129]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 202b1604-6be0-4d07-47ab-08d88a087936
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB0027:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB0027E62BC7F18ECDAA9613FCDEE30@DM5PR11MB0027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2B6YP2jpnqQEvjmvJxw/EUI2gM8Jn/TCTCehn4EzF6mXLEEtCwIZ43TCYptd0jxP/xse+0+QrmZ1jprDqaqVjz631Uqm/o9YbqcYjgnZ+w+v6r8c+71IV2xTmMqxTXslQIbebWVJdE2yzDUS86As9XjDvu/ZFvOY68eAMnSvwyXf5ZLBffwk7i6u5v6l3rja5y/7RS99cGuQOmfH/jOyMZP6iyCorJ26m+LBF97xXsepuzFjSw2oOkNC6C2bsGtI6S3cjGTlFsM/b9AOaEosfA+Vxbfg07sV8S8lbQQ/uTsr+rZJOGeNmiIS/duCPfnUZhpar+GfeeuyDIpS4IS/uzOF35wm1vFpLvTiO5AFYATRsOjD/I7Jw7M+dbi7nThUpozthQ8Wog8jWAphLBILbw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(396003)(110136005)(107886003)(2906002)(4326008)(966005)(478600001)(6512007)(6506007)(6486002)(316002)(53546011)(186003)(26005)(8676002)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(83380400001)(91956017)(76116006)(66946007)(33656002)(36756003)(86362001)(166002)(71200400001)(5660300002)(2616005)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2F4E6BB2F743454B99ECD8AD1185758Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 202b1604-6be0-4d07-47ab-08d88a087936
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Nov 2020 08:20:26.9493 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: fkMNGFp4xO2syMlqoIGLchoxNsTcyYJGl23aLQz91IdHzYJCVNFlL9P5sJHrYKF0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB0027
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qHDgiHwZwUlDkmmVEPMyu055grM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:20:33 -0000

Dear WG,


As discussed during the WG call:

There is an overall framework draft, which is an individual document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/

There are also many related protocol-specific iFIT individual drafts in various WGs.

It is better to have a framework draft to reach maturity (adoption) first.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Monday, November 2, 2020 at 12:56 AM
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/2/2020 to 11/16/2020).

The draft can be accessed at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu/

The authors should provide IPR statements by 11/5/2020 so the IDR WG can consider the IPR status in their
decision.

This draft adds the IFIT sub-TLV to the BGP Tunnel Encaps attribute for the SR policy tunnel type. This sub-TLV is only valid for SR Policy tunnel types.  Within the IFIT  sub-TLV value field, 5 sub-TLVs may be included (4 for IOAM and 1 for Enhanced Alternate Marking).

The IDR co-chairs thank the authors for their patience.  The WG adoption call for this draft has been delayed by the process of switching shepherds for BGP Tunnel Encaps draft.  Many BESS and IDR drafts currently refer to the BGP tunnel encapsulation drafts.

In your review of this draft, please differentiate between the following:

  *   Support/rejection of In-situ Flow Telemetry (IFIT) as a IP routing technology,
  *   Support/rejection of alternate marking as a IP routing technology,
  *   Support/rejection of adding new sub-TLVS for SR Policy tunnel type of BGP Tunnel Encap Attribute, and
  *   Specific issues with the descriptions of these features in the draft.

Cheers, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email