Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12

Susan Hares <> Tue, 09 March 2021 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526C53A1321; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:25:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.95
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s84-i-2vfZh8; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:25:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F5F83A1322; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:25:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'David Smith (djsmith)'" <>, 'Alvaro Retana' <>,, "'Juan Alcaide (jalcaide)'" <>
Cc:, 'IDR List' <>
References: <> <000701d6f57c$6c20ff60$4462fe20$> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:25:44 -0500
Message-ID: <00f001d71500$db52a9d0$91f7fd70$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00F1_01D714D6.F27DDA50"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQG0AKOQNn1lYe92YD3FYgSN9OtAkAFkuY89Aw8/LRgCoseUawJmfsuBAjEw3RYBa5vb/KpZL6gg
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210308-0, 03/08/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 16:25:51 -0000



I would like to review the draft after your revision for the AD’s Comments.   I can do this after you submit -13.txt or before.   


I suspect that Alvaro will have a few minor comments on -13.txt so it can work in parallel. 


Cheers, Sue 


From: David Smith (djsmith) [] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 9:40 AM
To: Alvaro Retana; Susan Hares;; Juan Alcaide (jalcaide)
Cc:; IDR List
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12




We believe we’ve addressed all of Alvaro’s comments. If any other feedback, please let us know. Otherwise, we’ll post v13 on Monday 4/15.







From: Idr <> on behalf of Alvaro Retana <>
Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 10:35 AM
To: "" <>, "" <>, "Juan Alcaide (jalcaide)" <>
Cc: "" <>, "idr@ietf. List" <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12






That part looks ok to me.






On February 24, 2021 at 7:52:47 AM, Juan Alcaide (jalcaide) ( wrote:

We assumed it was understood, but it's always better to have a new set of eyes 😉


We did some rewording below. Tried to simplify the abstract and expand some explanation in introduction (simpler than in Motivation section)


Let us know if there is need for more rewording.