IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] Re: Shepherd Report for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-link-mtu-07

"zhuyq-ietf2024@foxmail.com" <zhuyq-ietf2024@foxmail.com> Wed, 18 September 2024 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuyq-ietf2024@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB4EC151093 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 03:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.078
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lOVLWr0Sw58Q for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 03:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out162-62-57-252.mail.qq.com (out162-62-57-252.mail.qq.com [162.62.57.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC1FC14F6E4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 03:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1726653635; bh=MBNJaHLo8lXZDw1X7/pCdwLFp5P/3bgRqsRd8fpmQMM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References; b=vOGuQryXubjRKZA8js2HJZ5Hs22dw2PQcm2DPcuThOot6zjoSRX55le16be1MfS/0 ZGizB/ScZFezAQGvfy4W8UTrM1vzY6ncip5E0Q2wpXhgG+tsFUA/2N06B01n4vWvQG 7TryIUrZMb8jhXadkrESU44nntaB9r/j3F0eciVw=
Received: from LAPTOP-62COFCP0 ([61.144.66.67]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszb9-1.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 219B8ED; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 18:00:33 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1726653633tirlvjk11
Message-ID: <tencent_C5A3DE13F642BEC36D8E61B8C23263634A05@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MyHh0PQai9Fpb7tYBvZk+Uce64SG5dQvgjmIlr4n4Isxpka8ByFvGTIoifCP8v aFVYkpS0NZfk2bvNKjBhYlV/bGfzBDw2tff76BAtN/6ac+HIsWAIdt7JWiG3mqiEtuyZvFe3j6ZH ULd9szpaoEHRTUsq2vn/a+zEILSKiL6jZpV897UV8vFX0mCsIHQhGTjdtUu59M7KWoFDWDvsLN6r y3o30Nh4y6ljnUbyw0i8gGEPYGEzz6HnXHfMm/ZI/p7+oEJSdi6EZiYlWg8FtqoLDL+MMJAxGSdM NLZ7knvLwka1DUoSopSOfPafiJRRanz5dUZnrvgagswqZhyvsFF2HpVUd6/XY1hXmfYk85lyBCl1 9gYgoWpAqS7n0DBYfqKmeSDefMQ+rSyN+JeUvMIF/yWdtdaLbeWkRT1rud2qb2MxOj38SINV72Wa J9yk+JP+OstfchZYGkQ4Y863RHssxQE6H/6abgTxl7fyXwHafR0oLHAU8ji9RXItflLDfbmrVceF 5jf3mGfzAr+rSe8iMk8akIu5s0zPtoymu/CEyuowtATmp2wMXXCZUbXJFP4SgU2KesBnIkj46hBw yMSsAcsY1VXQSfvgF0dYrfgvourZMkf8pAaDO3V10GqApmnL0nW0gilkp/do/M0skdoh0TRZypkk uviOO2IllM+Sh6Tjq/PVbThuhhjCy7AZO7DJX/fi+TyHCz/WR/RH3rN2eAH7hTqM6OSfM6Ov8fhz aaP4eAtsMpS0qdHVyD24yB4CUEMmbmefmf3snS1/+HrXB4fzbL2EvkIWKJanpPyQi0GFlX2nUOUC CKcq57nDel1WMfH3lkrlH+/nIGrFQ01OxEwjcROIXR7wnKmlTcQmKZMCUnMXUhaAR4uSy2gjKw4L QKQCoAQGoQqcctnAhPwoWxUIsMcd5fmJTzdO1G2Iwro4SrvcU2QelPZnJEehM5faDdTLX7XKbSVG SrwwCp16kZqFVUCpKFfQ32SUxzxzt2zoemU/547AJIS2PKMxaN7JcARV7yza3ATi5uVoqZz1luaN 8sT7Wz8w==
X-QQ-XMRINFO: OD9hHCdaPRBwq3WW+NvGbIU=
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 18:00:32 +0800
From: "zhuyq-ietf2024@foxmail.com" <zhuyq-ietf2024@foxmail.com>
To: shares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
References: <CO1PR08MB661104ABEC887652A82774A2B3972@CO1PR08MB6611.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 68DA2AAF-4C34-4692-8E70-EE94E5A5F45E
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.259[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <2024091818003188875323@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart157524763130_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: E3L4X53AR3KX2GPESCVIT5WCYAA3N6K7
X-Message-ID-Hash: E3L4X53AR3KX2GPESCVIT5WCYAA3N6K7
X-MailFrom: zhuyq-ietf2024@foxmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: zhuyq8 <zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn>, "robbins.mwehair@mtn.com" <robbins.mwehair@mtn.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: Shepherd Report for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-link-mtu-07
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/vosfnZoGRx8BB7h4cglS13xzmb8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Sue, 
 I updated the draft according to your suggestion, here is the difference between the 2 versions:
Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-link-mtu-08
Thanks. 
B.R.
Yongqing Zhu
China Telecom



zhuyq-ietf2024@foxmail.com
 
From: Susan Hares
Date: 2024-08-31 00:05
To: idr@ietf.org
CC: zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn; robbins.mwehair@mtn.com
Subject: [Idr] Shepherd Report for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-link-mtu-07
 
Shepherd report for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-link-mtu-07   
 
Status: WG Document 
Implementations: Unknown, need 2 for WG LC  
draft status: Needs 
 
Summary of Review: Needs -08 prior to WG LC  
Status: Needs to resolve 4 technical issues and 1 editorial. 
 
Technical issues: 
 
1. Please replace [RFC7752] with [RFC9552]
 
2. Introduction, paragraph 5, fix reference to [RFC9085]
 
Old text:/
   [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext] defines SR extensions to
   BGP-LS and specifies the TLVs and sub-TLVs for advertising SR
   information. /
New text:/
   [RFC9085] defines SR extensions to
   BGP-LS and specifies the TLVs and sub-TLVs for advertising SR
   information. 
 
3. Security Section. 
 
Link MTU provides proprietary information regarding a network. 
See security section in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-05 
for consideration.  
 
Please consider adding many of the points from this section include:
1) security consideration for [RFC9552], Trusted environment of 
BGP-LS [RFC8402], and confidentiality of MTU data. 
 
4. Fix the references 
 
 
Editorial changes: 
Change-1 Abstract, paragraph 2, remove 
 
The abstract needs to be 2 paragraphs.  Please just remove paragraph 2.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status