Re: [Idr] Review of draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-07

[Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]>]

Hi Alvaro,

Just one additional comment here.


> In reviewing the mail
> archive, I didn't see an explicit call for adoption or direction from
> the chairs to take the document to the ISE, just lack of interest (not
> a lot of comments).


+

 However, I don't see that
> documented anywhere or active discussion on the list about it.
>


This draft has been discussed in IDR on Aug 2nd 2019 and functionality
discussed was considered useful by number of WG members. I have actually
never seen any push back from IDR chairs not to adopt this work sent to
the list.

Ref: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/zHNioWl24mdTthQA0O4OatZ2uy4/

In fact below message proves the opposite - comment from chairs about
publication of Operational Message:

Ref: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RmObg6bEhwbs2BEy-l5CnDBKPbc/

As I see from emails there was commitment to join the work, review and
resubmit BGP Operational Message:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yorRQMPTm8RRc8L5ZPbX04cHRr0/

We were hoping that authors of  bgp version capability could join that as
well. Well it apparently never moved. I was under impression that they gave
up on it.

So I am a bit surprised to see this proposal is coming now via a bit
different doors.

Kind regards,
Robert.