Re: [Idr] Review of draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-07

Robert Raszuk <> Sat, 22 August 2020 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329E13A0825 for <>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 05:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lm_vq3XY2Skj for <>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 05:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50C03A0819 for <>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 05:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id ba10so3807357edb.3 for <>; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 05:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bq4Fnn8J/jPsOcJoB1B0NWVB0Ld08wC3UfkwC96MzLM=; b=SpONzbOJY6ubAVYH4D0eIbEMVVVgilfeyN09XYGs82btaY5gYTjTa2BcQngvgFW6ib Q3swm0RIZENal7At1BxJpd2SSyBvZqWW97/IksUyS9nWgTS9fgmrKjdOh+m/m3qbxH8S mFiiSNEzejlg88Pvlxbnj2WTB8vuQawxRgaxT81hNZNmL9zZLBvVqSCF7K/egff2U1c/ N4yCvQCkXI+14Bm9aezVpH0DsekUUxndW7GnjXTS9k0EmdXl1RlKGbC63gIfA7ERqWQV 41rcecNF5nCXI6ocQFmZfmoBl86EQltddH+Ir9LOHHPtkbl/xIlTKgJglBMblg6OcKyT ZszQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bq4Fnn8J/jPsOcJoB1B0NWVB0Ld08wC3UfkwC96MzLM=; b=jFlBJTW7oGpqjt8KWfTg05gamgyCnG4UaULXO0oIHmJYjIdgLV0qf/NT2fJI4gTf4t zPYGjmWlLQ+9AYkNcSvL1ghjiSO8Y30XVYy7h/4gQp5my+5hk7RNOhT7svZZbITNaChW tqUBYFDsbWlA+3AI45cKBaeuze0RBt9Rp4zPnEqUrSAFY+jn76XWeN5LFpQJCP7FFoI4 vqg2Q56wbgeJzKEmvbghutS2UobwlORSItPsgQ1pBxDiyC5XXGPEtppLsTckFTF2o+tw Zw9XI2JruWizzzsZ93bZSpQ6MDYq1qeVwoLWtzCCEINpa9WAelhrwNwuFxRoYav+jbPd 6PaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Sy5ob08MAAa/EUQ3U2U/hs6NP65RQtpKqtSyeKm9rxiUuyA/7 6KOqDUjXj37LaUnsPyijYELvILQ4mBLcaCVGs90T7Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfFnPbWARu7ICBbLzYvixJ21KalIeFUSBk0mI7+Ldr5WeS5M0F/ykl5/sDCYJlKEai0R6hvJWSRlenUGmMnHM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:22c8:: with SMTP id dm8mr7440090edb.41.1598099950009; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 05:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Robert Raszuk <>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:39:00 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: Alvaro Retana <>
Cc:, Donatas Abraitis <>, IDR List <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d617de05ad76a3cd"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Review of draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-07
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 12:39:13 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

Just one additional comment here.

> In reviewing the mail
> archive, I didn't see an explicit call for adoption or direction from
> the chairs to take the document to the ISE, just lack of interest (not
> a lot of comments).


 However, I don't see that
> documented anywhere or active discussion on the list about it.

This draft has been discussed in IDR on Aug 2nd 2019 and functionality
discussed was considered useful by number of WG members. I have actually
never seen any push back from IDR chairs not to adopt this work sent to
the list.


In fact below message proves the opposite - comment from chairs about
publication of Operational Message:


As I see from emails there was commitment to join the work, review and
resubmit BGP Operational Message:

We were hoping that authors of  bgp version capability could join that as
well. Well it apparently never moved. I was under impression that they gave
up on it.

So I am a bit surprised to see this proposal is coming now via a bit
different doors.

Kind regards,