Re: drums2?

[Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>]

On 8/14/02 at 1:37 PM -0700, [e-mail] wrote:

>>2821/2822 are "Proposed Standards" and have been out for 1.5 years 
>>now. What will it take to move them forward to Draft Standard?
>
>A new version of 2822 may be needed as well.

It does. I've got a list of small errors that need to be corrected. I 
should be able to come up for air in a few weeks and perhaps start on 
the revision. It really shouldn't take too long.

>I suspect 2822bis would be able to move to draft.

I agree. Who gets to do the implementation review for this?

>>P.S. If 2821 and 2822 need to be reissued, it might also be nice if 
>>they could be done in time to get the numbers 3821 and 3822. My 
>>estimate is that those numbers will be reached in about 23 months. 
>>That should give us enough time to work on them, if we started now. 
>>:-)
>
>Good point ;-)

We could get close to 3422 or maybe 3522 for Draft. I think we should 
shoot for 3822 for Full Standard. :-) (SMTP is SMTP, but the mail 
format really is 822!)

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <mailto:[e-mail]>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]