IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-and-github] [Ext] GIT WG disposition

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Mon, 31 August 2020 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331FE3A1463 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MPpoIVv0Uuxr for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAAC3A1414 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 07VEZEK8031223 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:35:14 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.595.3; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:35:13 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0595.003; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:35:13 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
CC: "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Ietf-and-github] GIT WG disposition
Thread-Index: AQHWf6PvpZ7TyK7qY0iQzqHSLBGO6A==
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:35:13 +0000
Message-ID: <122FF431-7981-4D29-820F-3C16C7F723AB@icann.org>
References: <3397887D-DF2C-4479-B029-7F57B3E8A7C4@cooperw.in> <F6E5C78A-CA1C-491D-8D9A-46B0C2254787@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <F6E5C78A-CA1C-491D-8D9A-46B0C2254787@eggert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0ACD30A5-6C17-489B-A1AA-CE6F77427A73"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-31_06:2020-08-31, 2020-08-31 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/3cGu54MmW6_gHMPrlzXWHXmQ_fY>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] [Ext] GIT WG disposition
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:35:30 -0000

On Aug 31, 2020, at 7:33 AM, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2020-8-31, at 15:52, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
>> The chairs and I would like to close the group while keeping the mailing list open. Please respond if you have any concerns about this, otherwise I’ll hit the close button next week.
> 
> I have a mild general preference to also see mailing lists close when WGs go away - do we expect significant future discussion here?

Personally, I do expect that there will be bursts of "how do I do $x", "my WG wants to do $y, is that acceptable", and so on. Not enough for a chartered WG, but enough for a mailing list.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email