Re: [ietf-nomcom] Help with three errata against RFC8713

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2023 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC3AC151079 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZBqGL4qhVwJR for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A620C14CE51 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2680182bc21so1411073a91.2 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 13:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691181490; x=1691786290; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=h1299FlcvOt79OQKD2Ew6dIJ7bJ9p+SMMtRerwVbe0k=; b=XpFQjbB7V7xBy/Mc2rkcShrcV8b/f9DkM2ojSeUGZTz6T5njcXAbmJt0jUKEp/EbNf cpzzGl4aZZR4fYvcZlX+Da91sz1m8h95XjuZWy//7e0fENfp2f4QWnDNQ1AMQVDqpNeV 9k18T3AVIPunsQb0y2DECbjfX1vzC0kxcualrdueRGOxMbf/zmt2GZeiXSCaVkad9Fl/ MSuCPf4WWZ947AEawYNo1x3D+tOMGsTQlcLRFniznGqvWgb6NOt39/KuGof4VlGP0xOd gSytEXUvDOb5oB350RSP4yQwpbWKlz0jmtKS4gmrWVeT9F3nNUAtgmAdQzUNDNIOh1w9 g8Sw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691181490; x=1691786290; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=h1299FlcvOt79OQKD2Ew6dIJ7bJ9p+SMMtRerwVbe0k=; b=M+x0XQxQfBXxESaCmHeo0+Ck7bGhfdI+PLez5TIJCEs3F2FgLdb+T1CHdzR4BmQqk2 mPjqm0bc1etm40kLq+83Eezqs2xCiYpTfbTOy7KuYU+bsE72KJNT0+zWLR8QN0HxSkXa oyUytAfefuez/90RZ7HM2tHU/iV5aoETmfoVhtQ4O6R7IDpddw4rl+w8H/PsVvNgwGo9 5jMwsLELZAlmvfTZVIwICudCox0sGiOrjTu6MnveQgKrjk8CZS3TuYOacxSkdrJ31RzW RvPLa4B0kcC/wbi1I7AEp/ofMQxolvHs9XbaBM2H2J9DNlbCe7MLWtQy9K/hQS1MElKy FKTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywow75hQhRERd+1qQoVM2nSKZ2xfGeJA8194SxbyUSOHl312HFK UgBcp9YWlORCbc2C8e6ECmg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGhuMtttPc9m2Mm5919Nl/l8LPlbDhmII7P8cI8ZVeF6iJtxHzizy4p/TxUET4lZdssA8Pp7w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4389:b0:268:efe:5e53 with SMTP id in9-20020a17090b438900b002680efe5e53mr2386743pjb.21.1691181490492; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 13:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2406:e003:10cc:9901:b2e1:1101:7ba7:19fd? ([2406:e003:10cc:9901:b2e1:1101:7ba7:19fd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bf22-20020a17090b0b1600b00263987a50fcsm4583226pjb.22.2023.08.04.13.38.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2023 13:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4bba3371-ff4b-ad3a-a541-20989a35b1af@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 08:38:05 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <C8B9E859-A7EA-4419-B9EB-28FD0E7774B5@eggert.org> <029d2e0a-7278-f260-5bd4-1101d97913f9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <029d2e0a-7278-f260-5bd4-1101d97913f9@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/NP_3JUElUTAmIGOB7q_XEkccp3w>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Help with three errata against RFC8713
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 20:38:15 -0000

Addendum: The first 3 "editorial" errata are indeed editorial and seem fine.

However, IMHO https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7275 is *not* editorial
and the requirements that it states are important. They should be retained,
even if moved to elswehere. HFDU.

Regards
    Brian

On 05-Aug-23 08:27, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> *Without* reading anyone else's replies, IMHO none of these are
> errata. They are all clearly intended to say what they say.
> So they should all be held for document update.
> 
> If there is a desire to make any changes, we have a process
> for that. I think that the rules should describe reality, so
> we should probably follow up via gen-dispatch.
> 
> Regards
>      Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 04-Aug-23 23:17, Lars Eggert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there are three NomCom-related errata filed against RFC8713:
>>
>> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7092
>> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7274
>> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7300
>>
>> I would appreciate some discussion around how I should dispatch them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lars
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ietf-nomcom mailing list
>> ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom