IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-nomcom] Help with three errata against RFC8713 - eid7300

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 04 August 2023 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2BEC151099 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AXJ3u-5jy-eo for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93446C14CE4D for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RHcW036jBz1nsyM; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1691180348; bh=+9CA3g/kuAKBsKiX4FilH3I8lI/vm8DxxFAZB73rvsQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=IE5XkCWYxrmKvCr2rY1wyE0Lu13k61tc8LhXLN6/v/5B7XBONLvSj9guJdtDzZhBG 2jVm8X8OQakvt08ineVs+TWpF/z7/wCIsUKY9y+3pSolHsGZ9hft8OO+n2xWqgWDsF ncLcEa6HYYH7KRNaqgd503k5sXdT5eu3ois15ez4=
X-Quarantine-ID: <ueTNvDEYqbSW>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.20.151] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4RHcVz505Nz1nryL; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <775ca1f4-1f14-bdd6-c520-8667d9abc3ab@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 16:19:06 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <C8B9E859-A7EA-4419-B9EB-28FD0E7774B5@eggert.org>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8B9E859-A7EA-4419-B9EB-28FD0E7774B5@eggert.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/uFpRXPcC1HyaBKubIkXc6dWqmvk>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Help with three errata against RFC8713 - eid7300
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 20:19:12 -0000

I may be misreading this, but the erratum appears to reverse nominee and 
candidate.  Nominees are the people being considered. We no longer have 
secret nominees (nor false nominees, thanks.) candidates are the people 
sent for consideration by the confirming body for consideration.  Those 
are confidential until approved. Unless I am reading it backwards, this 
erratum should be rejected and the text retained as is.

Yours,

Joel

On 8/4/2023 7:17 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are three NomCom-related errata filed against RFC8713:
>
> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7092
> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7274
> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7300
>
> I would appreciate some discussion around how I should dispatch them.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-nomcom mailing list
> ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email