IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-nomcom] Help with three errata against RFC8713

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 04 August 2023 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEA3C14CE42 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lt6aEu1Y-QPz for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14C11C14CE45 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDEA38990; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 10:43:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id f88B686PbKyU; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 10:43:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:b241:6fff:fe09:a92b]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E493C3898F; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 10:43:30 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1691160210; bh=eKHMJFj9bP5JWIoTjkpAjunJ7osq5ujo/z7QwAWfz6E=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=r7reB6vY2Skdc3rMJ5mL4rvKIlHgy6AioFYpnuc/7rLqVGErGi0dnWIGQFNQvJjK5 f+OW4UrAko3zZLnaRuH5muWsibjS6tCmvk+TFv3MtF+N4Po4R1W0e8DUs9Oxx1vE+k F1H0TuKNm5S2J9EnkKJDJjLgTEiS47VYs6hkxmImaC0VSt4+co9xXL2F4saaXohKsg 8y1ycOkf/0VNvBsi7FZvedRK6v9aAAJJ9yvguSsdYwX6I/yV+J4LFu1u/j5sYFaO+A 2VmDzuXFkZ8TRS8xYlOvKuNdmWTtxKHo0JHgnRaxwZX8OBmBa4Gq4MN4/mtTLvB24U AmiAPaCXqdJbw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14894A7; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 10:43:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <C8B9E859-A7EA-4419-B9EB-28FD0E7774B5@eggert.org>
References: <C8B9E859-A7EA-4419-B9EB-28FD0E7774B5@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:43:30 -0400
Message-ID: <17378.1691160210@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/TYpIVvAD6vbTeIGuW25iapiSLaw>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Help with three errata against RFC8713
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 14:43:38 -0000

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7092

My interpretation of "re-run the process" is that the process is this thing
that spits out a *single* nominee.  Normally, we "run the process" 10 times
to get 10 names.

It does not mean, "reset everything and start over", it means, "up-arrow-return"
I agree that the wording is confusing.

> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7274

refers to section 5.10.
I don't agree that it has not been followed by any recent committee.
I'm pretty sure that I was asked to "include the set of skills or expertise
the nominator believes the nominee has that would be desirable" when I
nominated people.

> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7300

I agree.  It should be deleted.

    > I would appreciate some discussion around how I should dispatch them.

Are we spinning the document?  Or what?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email