IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-nomcom] Help with three errata against RFC8713

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 04 August 2023 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE00C14CE42 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VE-tFKhzgroF for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4BFCC14CE45 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 30B328074F; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 17:40:34 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1691160035; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=x6tNditYC/K9Djh3DrUkQTFtMe8XxKKuFx4/5uSMO+c=; b=pXnVnzOVhn4bVx0+R0hAeKblLvAiCeIkUzXB2d0RvrSyWGM1k0ya5GElveuipOCtu72+3s BS+SeBqFSlDG2FxMdH22SKI7PRxH0/jd5v2mCUJPdcOJbJkO2ypZSG5b/3sk6q2AENUmWh XiaQSibklCrNswUh8GnMeb+phW3exqLc6rStOUpHiUDJBxTTG/IIMHa3LXKOs4b5s/uqTO a/MXAHhFWqFuZBmQMatK47AqCReZdZRxZMnM85qqD/PSEhiNOcrz43E+xhXYn4i+N84qwu fMjyHPleBSdw1TujBmCEa/qLX8Nue8QSU6s3p3Id9Q02AvWuM/bcUkbi+nEj8A==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_87C11139-2965-4B49-B24B-44A9AF4D0382"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <5615F879-2141-43F5-B23F-CD930B25E49A@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 17:40:34 +0300
Cc: "ietf-nomcom@ietf.org" <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <22635DC3-43A2-4A3D-911F-EBB6CE90B4E8@eggert.org>
References: <C8B9E859-A7EA-4419-B9EB-28FD0E7774B5@eggert.org> <5615F879-2141-43F5-B23F-CD930B25E49A@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/wmkmXsIMer_mhIs240sSGGjsrI8>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Help with three errata against RFC8713
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 14:40:42 -0000

Hi,

On Aug 4, 2023, at 17:36, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
>> there are three NomCom-related errata filed against RFC8713
> 
>> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7092 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7092>
>> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7274 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7274>
>> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7300 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7300>
> 
> Looking at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/rfc8713, I see seven. Have you already decided about the other four? They were, in my view as the person who filed them, strictly editorial clarifications.

I have not, because in my errata queue (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rec_status=2&area_acronym=gen&errata_type=2&presentation=table), I only see the three I mentioned above.

CC'ing the RPC, so they can check what is going on.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email